Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.
View Poll Results: With performance numbers being similar between the NEW Boxster S and a Comptech S/C S2000, is it wor
2005 Boxster S (,000 plus lots of tax)
37.68%
2005 S2000 (,000) + Comptech S/C, w/ upgraded diff, gears, and clutch (,000) plus ,000 cash in your pocket.
24.64%
2002 S2000 (,000) + Comptech S/C, w/ upgraded diff, gears, and clutch (,000) plus ,000 cash in your pocket.
37.68%
Voters: 69. You may not vote on this poll

Boxster S or S/C S2000 + $$

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-08-2005, 03:34 AM
  #11  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Ckcrigger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Okoboji
Posts: 1,046
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yeah, $30k could go a long way upgrading the fleet!

I'd rather have a S/C S2000 + newish Pathfinder / used FX

than

New Boxster S + rusting crapmobile....

Because the SUV is the car we pick up our friends and go out to dinner in....

But if you already have very nice alternate cars in the fleet, house paid off, kids' college fund put away, and lots of cash in the bank... I'd pay the extra money for the Boxster S.

Time to start saving up so I can "afford" one by the time the S2k bites it!
But who knows what new shiny car will appear by then?

Toys, you gotta love them!
Old 02-08-2005, 04:08 AM
  #12  
Registered User
 
My R2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: The Beach
Posts: 1,784
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I would go with the S/C S2000.

On a side note: I'd get a used NSX before a BS.
Old 02-08-2005, 05:20 AM
  #13  

 
JonBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 19,712
Received 234 Likes on 165 Posts
Default

I chose 2002 S2000 with Comptech S/C and $30K cash. I would prefer the 9000 rpm rev limiter to the 8000 rpm rev limiter, plus I'd also like the extra $10K in my pocket.

The Boxster S appears to be just about the perfect sports car for daily driving (plus fun on the track and such). It's not too big, it's moderately powerful, and supposedly easy to drive (I've never driven one).

However, I'd much rather a "more hardcore" car and the extra cash to get a pretty nice daily driver than a really nice sports car that does everything well (except carry four people). I'm too logical to pick the BS over the S2000 with a good daily driver, in my current position... Of course, if I had a daily driver already, I'd grab the Boxster S, I think.
Old 02-08-2005, 05:52 AM
  #14  
Registered User

 
esracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Corpus Christi, Tx
Posts: 4,316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I picked the third option, I mean shoot you can use that extra 30,000 for so much more, by a used G35, used STi, EVO or something extra. I would be much happier with a Supercharged S2k and a G35 in my stable than just a Boxster.
Old 02-08-2005, 09:03 AM
  #15  
Registered User
 
integrate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Irvine
Posts: 8,079
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

At my time of purchase, I chose the S2000 simply because I like the looks of it a lot more and it was pretty much identical to the BS's performance level for a lot less of the price. Even now, it's still pretty close.

I certainly could've bought the BS if I had wanted, but it looks too plain jane IMO and there are too many Boxsters around my area. Sure, the Boxster S may be superior to the S is some ways, but I'm just not paying $20K more for a car of which I don't like the looks of and especially when I can get a car that does everything I need for much less.
Old 02-08-2005, 05:21 PM
  #16  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Ckcrigger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Okoboji
Posts: 1,046
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

But the new Boxster S will be >> than a stock S2000.
Old ones, no brainer. But now, nicer interior and larger engine....

But I'll still take the $30k and upgrade the beater SUV into something nice. When I've upgraded all the other cars in the fleet, then maybe the Boxster S....
Old 02-09-2005, 12:20 PM
  #17  
Registered User
 
S2KANDRE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,088
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ckcrigger' date='Feb 8 2005, 04:34 AM
Yeah, $30k could go a long way upgrading the fleet!

I'd rather have a S/C S2000 + newish Pathfinder / used FX

than

New Boxster S + rusting crapmobile....

Because the SUV is the car we pick up our friends and go out to dinner in....

But if you already have very nice alternate cars in the fleet, house paid off, kids' college fund put away, and lots of cash in the bank... I'd pay the extra money for the Boxster S.

Time to start saving up so I can "afford" one by the time the S2k bites it!
But who knows what new shiny car will appear by then?

Toys, you gotta love them!
Old 02-11-2005, 04:09 PM
  #18  
Registered User
 
SkullDeezay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: San Diego
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'd definitely go with the S/C S2000, either one, over the new Boxter S. I'd get a Vette, NSX, or a Viper if I was going to spend 60k.
Old 02-13-2005, 02:36 AM
  #19  
Zam
Registered User
 
Zam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Warner Robins, GA
Posts: 509
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If an extra $20k ain't that big of a deal to you, then you may as well go for the latest and greatest. For us poor bastards that search for the lowest price for everything, then the S2k is your better/more logical choice.

Ask the same question on a Porsche site & you're going to get reverse answers.
Old 02-13-2005, 03:03 AM
  #20  
Registered User
 
Shinigami's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 944
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The Boxster just doesn't light my fire. It's a great car, good to drive (I've had a go in the older S version), but an S2000 excites me more.

Guess I'm just not a Porsche fan (and never have been).


Quick Reply: Boxster S or S/C S2000 + $$



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:37 AM.