BMW M1/1M hits the 'RING!
#21
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Orlando
Posts: 6,536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dr. WOT,Apr 15 2010, 06:52 AM
PS- I love how BMW covers up the Roundel on the hood, like that's going to conceal what kind of car it is. I saw a 335is last week with that same "camo" on it... boy did that throw me off...
I saw a red 335is 3 days ago on the way to a dealership in Miami. I wonder why the one u saw was "camoued"
#22
Originally Posted by tarheel91,Apr 14 2010, 12:24 PM
I was unaware test mules were supposed to be attractive.
Oh well, it gives the badge chasers something to lust after.
#23
Originally Posted by rnye,Apr 15 2010, 01:50 PM
I was unaware that an "M" model rids a car of its dopey porportions or styling cues - headlights, tail lights, roofline, etc. Oh wait, it doesn't. It's an ugly car - whether its a 128, 135 or M1/1M/WTFever. BMW 1 series = fail. Even moreso than the original E65 and Z4.
Oh well, it gives the badge chasers something to lust after.
Oh well, it gives the badge chasers something to lust after.
One of the main complaints about the current 1 series is the "potbelly" look caused by that weird line on the bottom of the car with a positive concavity. THAT is the kind of thing that could be changed by sideskirts, bumpers, etc.
Complain that you think the current 1 series looks bad, but don't complain about how a car that's only been seen in test mule form is ugly.
#24
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Orlando
Posts: 6,536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by rnye,Apr 15 2010, 09:50 AM
I was unaware that an "M" model rids a car of its dopey porportions or styling cues - headlights, tail lights, roofline, etc. Oh wait, it doesn't. It's an ugly car - whether its a 128, 135 or M1/1M/WTFever. BMW 1 series = fail. Even moreso than the original E65 and Z4.
Oh well, it gives the badge chasers something to lust after.
Oh well, it gives the badge chasers something to lust after.
It has always been interesting to me how most people consider the 5 series a fail yet they adore the M5. Badgechasers? Do you know what percentage split is between the 128i and 135i? Are you aware that there is not a major price discrepancy? I've been on the Bimmerboards for years and you would be SHOCKED where most of those badgechasers come from.
I'm not fascinated about your new money pit of a Nissan but I do respect the performance it could yield.
#25
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Easton
Posts: 5,642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Onehots2k,Apr 15 2010, 12:16 PM
There is some stupid law that requires them to do that. I'll look for it.
I saw a red 335is 3 days ago on the way to a dealership in Miami. I wonder why the one u saw was "camoued"
I saw a red 335is 3 days ago on the way to a dealership in Miami. I wonder why the one u saw was "camoued"
#26
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Orlando
Posts: 6,536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dr. WOT,Apr 15 2010, 10:29 AM
I was wondering the same. I will say I'm assuming it was the 335is... it was an E92 with what looked like updated taillights and the covered up badges. So based on the fact that they made an attempt to disguise it I came to that conclusion. The other weird part is that central Jersey isn't really a know proving ground. I've seen lots of BMW test cars roaming around SoCal, but Bedminster NJ... the was the first.
#27
Originally Posted by rnye,Apr 15 2010, 09:50 AM
I was unaware that an "M" model rids a car of its dopey porportions or styling cues - headlights, tail lights, roofline, etc. Oh wait, it doesn't. It's an ugly car - whether its a 128, 135 or M1/1M/WTFever. BMW 1 series = fail. Even moreso than the original E65 and Z4.
Oh well, it gives the badge chasers something to lust after.
Oh well, it gives the badge chasers something to lust after.
I like small cars and I love the size of the thing. Do I wish it were lighter than the 3 series by more than a couple hundred lbs? Sure. Do I wish it were slightly prettier? Sure. But it is totally acceptable in my book and I don't give two shits about badges.
#28
Originally Posted by tarheel91,Apr 15 2010, 12:16 PM
M Cars frequently feature different side skirts, bumpers, etc.
One of the main complaints about the current 1 series is the "potbelly" look caused by that weird line on the bottom of the car with a positive concavity. THAT is the kind of thing that could be changed by sideskirts, bumpers, etc.
Complain that you think the current 1 series looks bad, but don't complain about how a car that's only been seen in test mule form is ugly.
One of the main complaints about the current 1 series is the "potbelly" look caused by that weird line on the bottom of the car with a positive concavity. THAT is the kind of thing that could be changed by sideskirts, bumpers, etc.
Complain that you think the current 1 series looks bad, but don't complain about how a car that's only been seen in test mule form is ugly.
It reminds me of the "tiny" car photoshops. No matter how you slice it its just not an attractive car and is forgetable at best - no flare/bumper/exhaust/wheel setup will change that.
#29
Originally Posted by rnye,Apr 15 2010, 11:56 AM
It reminds me of the "tiny" car photoshops.
The 3 series is the only good looking car in BMW's lineup IMO. And even then, you have to be careful with wheels, body kit packages, etc, cuz it can get ugly, fast. I thought the new Z4 might have been a sign that BMW is moving in a better direction, but after seeing the car in person along with the 5 GT, I changed my mind.