better performance?? s2k or M coupe
06-01-2002, 08:36 AM
#21
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
this is the break down if I were to purchase the s2k
32800
+2500 tax
+3000 Hardtop
+2000 wheels
+5000 or more vortech S/C or comptech
and then warranty is voided
this is a rough estimate but that would put it at 45+k for the s2k and then you would still suffer without the options in the M3
I read several posts about the s/c and not very happy with the reliability. I know that problems arise with the S/C and I'm not very savy with cars so even a little fix would be way to complicated for me.
Someone stated that the M3 was known for blown rods but wasn't there a problem with s2k differentials blowing??
I don't know...I love the S but can't live with it just stock
I would probably spend the same amt of $$ with the modded S as I would with the Stock M3.
Stock 333 hp is more reliable in the long run than a modded 340 hp S/C s2k right???
no offense to the Z06 but I was never a fan of chevy, My first chevy was an s10 pickup and my parents have owned over 5 different chevy's and reliabilitly is poor. I bought the s10 new in 96 and had a five year warranty and over the five years, over 15 thousand in repairs from starters(notice I mentioned starters) to crack head. Basically everything has been replaced twice (thank god for warranty) Scares me to purchase a 55+k Z06 and have it in the shop every month.
32800
+2500 tax
+3000 Hardtop
+2000 wheels
+5000 or more vortech S/C or comptech
and then warranty is voided
this is a rough estimate but that would put it at 45+k for the s2k and then you would still suffer without the options in the M3
I read several posts about the s/c and not very happy with the reliability. I know that problems arise with the S/C and I'm not very savy with cars so even a little fix would be way to complicated for me.
Someone stated that the M3 was known for blown rods but wasn't there a problem with s2k differentials blowing??
I don't know...I love the S but can't live with it just stock
I would probably spend the same amt of $$ with the modded S as I would with the Stock M3.
Stock 333 hp is more reliable in the long run than a modded 340 hp S/C s2k right???
no offense to the Z06 but I was never a fan of chevy, My first chevy was an s10 pickup and my parents have owned over 5 different chevy's and reliabilitly is poor. I bought the s10 new in 96 and had a five year warranty and over the five years, over 15 thousand in repairs from starters(notice I mentioned starters) to crack head. Basically everything has been replaced twice (thank god for warranty) Scares me to purchase a 55+k Z06 and have it in the shop every month.
06-01-2002, 08:39 AM
#22
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by steve c
Being that the new M3 is only available as a coupe I can't figure out why we try to confuse ourselves in this thread by adding the coupe bit.
M coupe = 2 door hard topped tail happy little rocket.
M3 = 2 door sedan.
-Steve (who will never ever ever sell his M coupe but is parting with the S2000 soon).
Being that the new M3 is only available as a coupe I can't figure out why we try to confuse ourselves in this thread by adding the coupe bit.
M coupe = 2 door hard topped tail happy little rocket.
M3 = 2 door sedan.
-Steve (who will never ever ever sell his M coupe but is parting with the S2000 soon).
M3 does have a soft top but thats another 10k...dont really like the looks of the soft top on the car
06-01-2002, 08:41 AM
#23
One thought...if you are going to compare performance you have to remember the top down factor!
The S2k is MUCH faster on a sunny day when the coupe will have its A/C on!
The S2k is MUCH faster on a sunny day when the coupe will have its A/C on!
06-01-2002, 10:33 AM
#24
Registered User
Also remember that the M3 convertible is substantially slower than the M3 coupe. I t runs almost the same time as S2K (13.7 vs. 13.8), is almost 1000 lbs. heavier (3700 lbs. vs. 2800 lbs.) and way more expensive. The Comptech supercharger had a few instances of differential housings going out, but that is a $400 fix, vs. throwing rods = new engine. Who needs wheels and a hardtop on the S2K ? If you get a coupe (like the solidity of the coupe design, need four seats) get the M3, otherwise the S2K. If your are coming from a japanese car you may like the 4 banger, if not you really better drive it first to see if you can handle the low end torque characteristics.
06-01-2002, 03:03 PM
#25
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
it snows hard here in NY..reason for the hardtop..keeps it warmer in the winter...it doesn't look as bad when you drive a sports car with a hard top in the winter...i think it looks silly in the winter with a hardtop..looks outta place
Care to elaborate?
06-02-2002, 07:28 AM
#28
Former Moderator
Originally posted by RxRx7
Is this a serious thread?
Is this a serious thread?
However, I digress. Even if the thread ISN'T serious, it IS valid.
Sorry, just felt like being verbose this morning...
06-02-2002, 04:44 PM
#29
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Royal Oak
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You really have to ask yourself what you want in a car. I got my s2ooo as a second car to my navigator so I didn't want to spend too much money. I wanted a fast convertable than was fun to drive and practicallity was not a major concern.
The m3 coupe is faster, better in adverse conditions, has more creature comforts, but isn't as tossable and is $14k more in its cheapest form ($21k more when properly optioned out).
The M3 convertible is a bit heavier and less aerodynamic and therefore a bit closer to the s2ooo in performance and sets you back $22k more base ($26k more properly optioned).
In all these cars you get what you pay for. If it was my only car, and I didn't live in MI, I would go M3 all the way.
The m3 coupe is faster, better in adverse conditions, has more creature comforts, but isn't as tossable and is $14k more in its cheapest form ($21k more when properly optioned out).
The M3 convertible is a bit heavier and less aerodynamic and therefore a bit closer to the s2ooo in performance and sets you back $22k more base ($26k more properly optioned).
In all these cars you get what you pay for. If it was my only car, and I didn't live in MI, I would go M3 all the way.
06-02-2002, 07:09 PM
#30
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
thanx for all the info..I was leaning towards the M3 to begin with but wasn't sure the performance and quality was worth the money..thanx for everyone's opinion