Been Discussed? Civic Type R
#51
Buying the mugen civic for 30k is even dumber than buying this thing for around 40 lol at least it performs amazingly, unlike the mugen which is just a body kit and wheels. I applaud honda for what they've aimed for and achieved with this new type r. But it won't sell here at their price. Not in big numbers at least. And we all know honda won't sell something unless it brings them profit. The exact reason we no longer have the rsx, s2000 and so on
#52
Give the Viper modern tires and then it's a (semi) fair comparison. Tires make a huge difference, especially for a car like that with massive torque. Michelin recently came out with a new bespoke tire for the Porsche Carrera GT and that one modification lowered it's 'Ring time by 10 seconds.
#53
I don't think that's entirely accurate. US crash standards consist of both tested elements and required equipment specs. So you can have a car that was built for the Japanese market and maybe will survive any crash test scenario in America, but it is not going to meet the same standards for things like headlamp position or windshield glass thickness. Those things must be changed, which saddles the manufacturer with additional cost.
I literally don't think there is such a thing as building a car that sell in the exact same same configuration in all markets due to the fact that different countries require different items to be checked off the list.
#54
http://www.caradvice.com.au/273678/h...d-admits-exec/
So you may want to dial back the fanboy. I don't think the car will be much faster than the Renault Megane, much less run under 8 minutes. Pretending it's already happened is just pretending.
#55
Originally Posted by JonBoy' timestamp='1395277503' post='23071420
Interestingly enough, it's probably quicker than all of the cars you mention. We're talking under 8 minutes around the Nurburgring...
http://www.caradvice...rd-admits-exec/
So you may want to dial back the fanboy. I don't think the car will be much faster than the Renault Megane, much less run under 8 minutes. Pretending it's already happened is just pretending.
#56
Originally Posted by JonBoy' timestamp='1395277503' post='23071420
Interestingly enough, it's probably quicker than all of the cars you mention. We're talking under 8 minutes around the Nurburgring...
http://www.caradvice.com.au/273678/h...d-admits-exec/
So you may want to dial back the fanboy. I don't think the car will be much faster than the Renault Megane, much less run under 8 minutes. Pretending it's already happened is just pretending.
I didn't pretend it's happened - I was merely pointing to their expectation of a Ring time.
#57
Have you looked at Nurburgring times to see what other cars are under 8 minutes? It's way quicker than an STi or Evo X around that track, for sure. We're talking a lap time that's similar to a last-generation Dodge Viper GTS and faster than a CTS-V.
Off the line, yes, it can't put power down as well but once it's rolling, it'll do just fine, I think.
Off the line, yes, it can't put power down as well but once it's rolling, it'll do just fine, I think.
It's OK, I'm just saying going on and on about how much faster this Civic is than some other very fast, very real cars based purely on marketing talk is silly. Pretty much textbook Honda fanboy behavior, as well.
#58
We'll wait and see and revisit it once it's run the ring. If Honda says it'll be the fastest, one thing I know is that it will be faster than 8:07 (which was the record when they said it) and, if it beats the Megane, sub-8 minutes.
Honda isn't one to miss performance targets and I have no reason to think this one to be any different.
Honda isn't one to miss performance targets and I have no reason to think this one to be any different.
#60
This.
If this car is really as good as they say it is, then, imagine it in RWD platform. Not sure what Honda is trying to prove by coming up with the fastest-wrong-wheel-drive car, other than being able to say, "see what a FWD Civic can do with all that jazz?"