Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

Autoweek: STS-V Review

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-07-2005, 03:56 AM
  #21  
Community Organizer
Community Organizer
 
FearlessFife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 7,623
Received 46 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Big_Al,Dec 6 2005, 12:46 PM
BMW and Cadillac are not in the same class. Why would grandpa need 107 hp/liter in his deville
Grandpa has to get to his Bingo game on time, damn it!!

STS-V is nice, I'd rather have an M5.
Old 12-07-2005, 04:03 AM
  #22  
Registered User
 
VTEC_Junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Berkeley
Posts: 4,709
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by F1DNA,Dec 6 2005, 12:11 PM
I think GM has a winner on its hands (especially if Honda is right about the M5 motor having to be rebuilt after 60,000 miles
phew... as long as it doesn't require rebuilding before 50K miles, then bmw doesn't have to worry about having to fix them under warranty...
Old 12-07-2005, 04:30 AM
  #23  
Registered User
 
My R2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: The Beach
Posts: 1,784
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

From what sw05s2k posted the caddy won't even be close enough in a straight line to even consider the curves with the M5

M5 by 100 points.....
Old 12-07-2005, 05:52 AM
  #24  

Thread Starter
 
QUIKAG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Dallas
Posts: 9,396
Received 427 Likes on 238 Posts
Default

You know something that really seems to set my thinking apart from many others on here is the facet of reliability and durability. I just flat do NOT trust BMW and their incredibly complicated 7-speed SMG and V10 motor as a DAILY DRIVER.

I think the STS-V with it's blown Northstar and relatively unsophisticated six-speed automatic will be much more reliable and liveable on a day to day basis than a V10 7-speed SMG wundermachine.

Not to mention, since when did handling really matter THAT MUCH in a 4 door family sedan?

I'll take the STS-V and put that extra $15k minimum towards a C6 Z06 that I would have otherwise blown on an M5 that would be INCREDIBLE when it's not in the shop for any # of electronic problems it will surely encounter.
Old 12-07-2005, 06:23 AM
  #25  

 
cdelena's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: WA
Posts: 9,210
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

You must think about the intended market.. 99% of STS owners are not going to be drag racing and don't really care about a 1 second difference in the quarter.

I know the owner of a standard STS and both he and I think it is a very nice car. I have not driven it but riding in it at a hurried pace makes it seem well suited to the owner and his peers (an active mid sixties well off white guy). He likes buying American and plans on buying a STS-V. He thinks cars in his circles are all about status, and chooses a daily driver for other reasons.. his wife drives a Maserati Quattroporte and he feels it was a lot of dollars for a 'look', but I guess he can afford it.
Old 12-07-2005, 07:27 AM
  #26  
Registered User
 
Iceman1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by b0mbrman,Dec 6 2005, 02:05 PM
Wasn't Cadilac aiming the CTS-V at the M5?
no...the CTS-V is aimed at and is competing with the M3, not the M5...

i commend cadillac for this car and all the *-V cars in entering the performance luxury market... i think they will have a good # of buyers wanting an american luxury sport sedan... its also roomier than an M5...

having said that... performance wise, its got nothing on the M5... straight line or road course... the M5's SMG tranny has 6 positive ratio gears (meaning greater than 1.0:1) it will pull up top like noone's business... in addition the SMG is a manual tranny underneath so it will shift a lot faster than an automatic, and the M5 has more HP and weighs less...

now, i personally wont get the SMG (too many problems waiting to happen).. i would wait a year for the M5 to come out in a traditional H-pattern 6-speed...
Old 12-07-2005, 08:18 AM
  #27  

 
F1DNA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Hazlehurst, MS
Posts: 715
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JonBoy,Dec 6 2005, 12:30 PM
Did Honda say the BMW motor has to be rebuilt every 60K miles? Where'd you hear/read that?
Read the articles about the V10 in the next NSX

F1DNA

Sebring/Black

T.D.
Old 12-08-2005, 06:49 AM
  #28  
Registered User
 
Mutlu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 714
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think the STS-V will do very well especially since the ride will be a lot more plush than the M5 even in its softest setting. The SMG is not very smooth and gets tiring after a while especially for somebody in the market for a 4 door sedan.
Old 12-08-2005, 11:36 AM
  #29  

 
F1DNA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Hazlehurst, MS
Posts: 715
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default



F1DNA

Sebring/Black

T.D.
Old 12-08-2005, 02:32 PM
  #30  
Registered User
 
derryck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Orange Park
Posts: 4,127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The SMG is not very smooth and gets tiring after a while especially for somebody in the market for a 4 door sedan
I agree the 6 spd SMGII found in the M3 is not smooth but the 7 spd SMG found in the new M5 is suppose to be much improved. Also, while I agree with Quikag the Caddy will probably be more reliable I would be an Accord or a Camry if I was after reliabilty. I think the Caddy is bland and boring despite it's power. I doubt it will be much quicker than an E46 M3 and I haven't looked at many Caddys recently outside of the XLR, CTS-V and Escalade but all were no where near BMW's fit and finish especially on the interior. I would take an E39 M5 over the Caddy in a heartbeat let alone the E60.


Quick Reply: Autoweek: STS-V Review



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:40 PM.