Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

Am I crazy for considering a MB SL55 over 996TT?

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-28-2006, 11:03 PM
  #41  
Registered User
 
Fanman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Glendale
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Chris Stack,Mar 28 2006, 10:39 PM
The only writing on the wall Porsche sees is the 996TT customers lining up to pay $xx,xxx to add leather and satnav and any number of other heavy options to their cars, and other customers lining up to pay $xxx,xxx for the GT2 and GT3.

Guys, these carmakers aren't dumb. They know what their audience will pay for, and what they want. They know their audience is mostly concerned with image. For those who want a stripped-down racing machine, Porsche is only too happy to charge $50k more than a turbo for a GT2. Porsche has already shown it is willing to handicap its low-end cars to get customers into a medium car (Cayman vs 997), why are you surprised when they handicap a medium-high end car to get them into a high end one (997TT vs GT2)?
Actually Porsche made big mistakes with the GT2. For the money that they charged it did not sell well at all. Many had tens of thousands of $ discounts because the GT2 could not sell. GT3's sold well though. But the big difference was that you got a nicely loaded GT3 for about $100K vs. a nicely loaded Carrera for about $85K. The 911 TT was about $130K vs. a GT2 for about $190K. Big difference in pricing strategy, and a big reason the GT2 did not sell, and why there is a debate on whether they will even have it for the 997 line.

That being said I agree with you. I loved my 996, but have serious reservations about buying another Porsche until they start offering discounts again (like they did with the 996's). To me the new Carrera S should have been the Carrera, and the upcoming Turbo S (supposedly 500-525 hp) should be the regular turbo. The current Carrera (325 hp) is a joke. That engine should have been in the Cayman S, and the 355 hp should have been the standard engine in the Carrera, with the 381 hp engine as the Carrera S option. Now you buy a Carrera S, and as if dropping $90K on the car wasn't enough, they want to charge you another $12K for a "powerkit" option. Ridiculous. I have no remorse when people were getting $6K-$10K discounts on their Porsche cars before.
Old 03-28-2006, 11:55 PM
  #42  
Registered User

 
mashoutposse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Forest Hills
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What about the upcoming M6?
Old 03-29-2006, 12:19 AM
  #43  
Registered User
 
Enthralled's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 14,373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

howdy,



Back in 99 i got caught up in the MB craze and got an E320.I had so many electrical problems(with window and stereo.must of gone to the dealer about 10 times in five years i owned the car for these reasons) I told myself i would never get a MB again.A friend of mine got an SL500 about a year and a half ago....he also has electrical problems with his car.

You would think if you payed so much money for a car atleast they should have the kinks out and run a good 6 years problem free.

I hear BMW has same problems


Peace
David
Old 03-29-2006, 12:44 AM
  #44  
Registered User

 
geoff2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Walnut/Diamond Bar, SoCal
Posts: 6,697
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

to each and his own your not crazy you just have an opinon
Old 03-29-2006, 11:42 AM
  #45  
Registered User
 
j-man8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've never driven a Porsche, but I do have an SL55. We've had it since last summer and we've put about 10000 miles on it. The car has not had a single problem; it has never had an unscheduled visit to the dealer. The power and acceleration is truly neck snapping. Every time I get into the driver's seat I'm amazed. The sound the SL makes when the top is down is like a muscle car. It's deep and resonating with just a hint of high pitched supercharger whine that only complements the sound. Even the handling is not what you'd expect from a 4400 lb car. It has a surprising amount of grip and can pull serious amount of lateral g's. The car seems to glide through turns with little drama. If you want to get the rear end loose, just turn off ESP and the car can become a welcomed handful.

Potentially, the true beauty of the car lies in the way it pampers you in addition to being properly sporty. The heated and cooled seats with massage make you feel like a king and takes away any feelings of fatigue. The panarama glass roof takes away any sense of chlostrophobia you may experience in other convertibles. I could truly drive the car for hours upon hours without tiring. And if you decide to drive cross country, you don't have to worry too much about space in the trunk with the top down because the roof takes very little room away from the luggage area. Access to your belongings with the top down is simple as well. All you have to do is press a button in the trunk and the top goes a quarter of the way up for easy access to the luggage. Press it again the top goes back down. You can even lower and raise the roof using just your key remote control; hold unlock for top down, hold lock for top up. The automobile is just so well thought out.
Old 03-29-2006, 11:53 AM
  #46  

 
Chris Stack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Arlington Heights, IL
Posts: 3,668
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

If we were to play the "You can only own one car, what is it?" game (instead of the "Spend $xxxxx" game in the other thread), some sort of SL would probably be my answer. SL600 vs SL55 would be a tough call though, they are roughly the same price I believe.
Old 03-29-2006, 12:09 PM
  #47  

 
HKStallion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Raleigh
Posts: 1,157
Received 12 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

why not look at maserati? similar class, but more exclusivity and a great parts supplier.

when i was in atlanta, i would literally see 20-30 SLs per day, and i cant even count how many p-cars i see.

Dave
Old 03-29-2006, 12:33 PM
  #48  

 
Chris Stack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Arlington Heights, IL
Posts: 3,668
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HKStallion,Mar 29 2006, 01:09 PM
why not look at maserati?
Reliability, maintenance cost, depreciation, and they are ugly. I'd go Jaguar if I wanted something less common than an SL, or a 6-series if I wanted an ugly car.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
keith2.2
Car Talk - Non S2000
74
10-17-2022 11:52 AM
Mortlach
Car Talk - Non S2000
363
03-13-2016 06:09 AM
RedUn
Car Talk - Non S2000
67
10-27-2010 03:54 AM
ge2
Car Talk - Non S2000
39
05-08-2008 03:30 AM
jhp012
Car and Bike Talk
44
12-13-2007 07:28 AM



Quick Reply: Am I crazy for considering a MB SL55 over 996TT?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:40 AM.