Which 90s sports car would you prefer to own?
05-26-2011, 07:46 PM
#73
Reliable - FD RX-7
05-26-2011, 10:27 PM
#74
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The FD looks good, but the engine is utter garbage. If you compare all aspects of ownership, the 300zx is the more complete car.
Hell, half of you are honda fanbois because you fiend for reliability. That's what keeps you away from better European cars. I find it hard to imagine any of you ever purchasing an RX7.
Hell, half of you are honda fanbois because you fiend for reliability. That's what keeps you away from better European cars. I find it hard to imagine any of you ever purchasing an RX7.
05-26-2011, 10:36 PM
#75
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by LUV2REV' timestamp='1306380070' post='20616538
Clearly clueless.
Sorry, it looks like the Japanese tried way to hard to copy a shitty American car and add Japanese accents. I'm glad you like it. I don't. I don't see how that makes me clueless. I also never said anything about performance, just that its looks makes my stomache churn.
05-26-2011, 10:49 PM
#76
Guys, it is not a nightmare to own, or even DD a turbo rotary. It just gets awful, awful gas mileage and demands a strict oil change schedule.
It's disturbing that so many of you rely on hearsay, having never owned or daily driven a rotary before.
It's disturbing that so many of you rely on hearsay, having never owned or daily driven a rotary before.
05-26-2011, 11:12 PM
#77
Styling is subjective, then fine. But power and reliability of the FD? Are you on drugs? On which planet was the FD more reliable (and powerful) than the 300ZX? Are you 12 now, which means you were non-existent back then? Your ignorance makes me believe so. Not only was the Z much more reliable, but it was easier to modify more power out of it; in stock trim, the Z had 300hp while the FD 255. People say the dumbest things online.
05-27-2011, 04:50 AM
#78
Yup, I am 12. daddy is gonna get me a skate board for my birthday.
I guess I should have explained a little more. Im not talking about stock vs. stock. I always thought the Z was a little more limited as far as making power without doing major modifications. Yes I am fully aware of the downfalls of a rotary motor and the problems that exist in owning one.
I guess I just dont remember seeing a ton of high HP Z32s running around.
Styling is subjective, then fine. But power and reliability of the FD? Are you on drugs? On which planet was the FD more reliable (and powerful) than the 300ZX? Are you 12 now, which means you were non-existent back then? Your ignorance makes me believe so. Not only was the Z much more reliable, but it was easier to modify more power out of it; in stock trim, the Z had 300hp while the FD 255. People say the dumbest things online.
I guess I should have explained a little more. Im not talking about stock vs. stock. I always thought the Z was a little more limited as far as making power without doing major modifications. Yes I am fully aware of the downfalls of a rotary motor and the problems that exist in owning one.
I guess I just dont remember seeing a ton of high HP Z32s running around.
Originally Posted by TheLast13' timestamp='1306432966' post='20619044
RX7. They Z cars never had the styling for me nor could they produce the power and reliabilty of the mazda or toyota
