350Z Roadster (pic)
03-06-2003, 04:22 PM
#3
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Princeton
Posts: 887
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
whoa, i hate to say it but it looks pretty nice. better than the hardtop version. I wonder how the top operates and if that metal part automatially opens and then hides the cloth top...
-anu
-anu
03-06-2003, 04:25 PM
#4
Registered User
you can't deny that it is a fine lookin ride. much better as a convert than a hardtop. plus, you get a (almost monte carlo) blue that frickin honda won't release in the states. what's honda's deal with that anyway?
the fact that they hide the ragtop is a significant plus for nissan.
the fact that they hide the ragtop is a significant plus for nissan.
03-07-2003, 03:59 AM
#6
...but goodie? 
I'm not sold on that flat back end - looks a lot like the old 300ZX (not necessarily a bad thing). I do like the roll hoops and raised curves behind the seats, though.
I'm not sold on that flat back end - looks a lot like the old 300ZX (not necessarily a bad thing). I do like the roll hoops and raised curves behind the seats, though.
03-07-2003, 07:22 AM
#7
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Gunma Prefecture,
Posts: 1,597
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The coupe has a more dramatic presence. The convertible looks too slab backed in the sun deck area. I don't really like the coupe so I'm not a fan of the drop top either.
Trending Topics
03-07-2003, 07:33 AM
#9
I think that's pretty much most peoples' thoughts on the car - front is fine (excellent to merely nice - I haven't had anyone tell me they dislike the front of the car) but the back end always draws some "okay, who sat on the car?" looks/comments...
