The 2nd OFFICIAL GT-R Thread
10-26-2007, 08:55 AM
#71
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
Posts: 3,365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
10-26-2007, 09:07 AM
#73
Registered User
[QUOTE=dombey,Oct 26 2007, 07:59 AM]
We've seen the 7:39 video in this thread. Even if it is 50 meters short, as everyone is quick to point out, that would take a screaming GTR how long to cover 50 meters? At 100km/hr, that is less than 2 seconds... and isn't the average speed way higher than that?
We've seen the 7:39 video in this thread. Even if it is 50 meters short, as everyone is quick to point out, that would take a screaming GTR how long to cover 50 meters? At 100km/hr, that is less than 2 seconds... and isn't the average speed way higher than that?
10-26-2007, 12:40 PM
#80
Registered User
You people complaining about the weight of this car just make me laugh. When was the last time you took your S2000 out to the track, let alone drove it at its limit?
A couple hundred extra lbs is not going to be holding you back with your hamfisted driving abilities.
On the contrary, you should appreciate the fact that Nissan realizes how most drivers are only F1 caliber in their own minds, thus the inclusion of a heavy, but stiff and safe chassis, and AWD.
IMO, this car may not be pretty, but its defenitely the most interesting shape for a new car I've seen in a long while. Only other car I see able to compete with this car is the Z06.
A couple hundred extra lbs is not going to be holding you back with your hamfisted driving abilities.
On the contrary, you should appreciate the fact that Nissan realizes how most drivers are only F1 caliber in their own minds, thus the inclusion of a heavy, but stiff and safe chassis, and AWD.
IMO, this car may not be pretty, but its defenitely the most interesting shape for a new car I've seen in a long while. Only other car I see able to compete with this car is the Z06.