Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

2014 Camaro Z28

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-27-2013, 09:30 PM
  #11  

 
TheDonEffect's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 8,107
Received 522 Likes on 400 Posts
Default

Waiting for the rumored irs mustang Lighter and 400+hp in a mass produced motor not to mention itll be affordable. Then there's the rumored cuda.
Old 03-27-2013, 10:13 PM
  #12  

 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Pawtucket, RI
Posts: 6,863
Received 124 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alex s
That's about the weight of the current M3, which seems to do fine despite its heft.
It does fine at being a German Camaro. Plenty of Bimmerphiles prefer the 900 lb. lighter E30 M3, as do I.

I'm interested to see what this can do before I start talking about how terrible it is. At least Chevrolet is trying, which is more than can be said for a lot of Japanese car companies these days.
It will be quite fast, I'm sure. But the current platform is such a TANK. Mass and size detract from fun. Here's to a much smaller and lighter 6th gen.
Old 03-28-2013, 03:26 AM
  #13  
Registered User
 
SpudRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ZDan
300 lb. lighter than 4100 lb. is still PIG heavy. Hopefully they get it right with the 6th gen, this generation is nothing but donor cars to me.
Yeah, I agree. Chevy may be able to put up some impressive numbers but at two tons or nearly two tons there seems little difference. I have a hard time believing any car that big and heavy would be fun in a way that puts a smile on your face no matter where you happen to be driving. My personal cutoff for fun cars is around 3,200 lbs.
Old 03-28-2013, 04:00 AM
  #14  
Registered User
 
20aeman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'd take that Z28 over an Elise/S2000/whatever other light car. It's definitely fun, but a different kind of fun. Then again, I've never been the type to enjoy parking lot acrobatics/cone dodging.
Old 03-28-2013, 04:31 AM
  #15  

 
WolfpackS2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 3,431
Received 281 Likes on 176 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by deepbluejh
The design refresh looks good to me. Front looks nice and the rear looks less offensive than the current one. The 500 horse LS-7 is a real gem and while not light, I'm sure the car will be a hoot to drive. It looks like a pretty thorough reworking to me and I think it's a mistake to underestimate it.

That said... $60,000 for a Z-28 camaro is just too much, IMO. That will buy a lightly used Z06 and for most people, that would be the obvious choice.

Where does it say that it will cost $60k? Despite having carbon ceramic brakes I have difficulty thinking this will cost more than the ZL1.
Old 03-28-2013, 05:05 AM
  #16  
Registered User

 
deepbluejh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

No official word yet, but MT estimated $60k as a base price.
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...28_first_look/

Again, just conjecture, so don't get all riled up yet.
Old 03-28-2013, 05:28 AM
  #17  

 
WolfpackS2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 3,431
Received 281 Likes on 176 Posts
Default

It would also be quite interesting to price this above the Corvette I think. As even the base model Stingray will outpace it around any race track.
Old 03-28-2013, 05:42 AM
  #18  

 
liquid_helix136's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,289
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

I dont understand the point of this car. If someone wanted a light(er)weight car from GM with a big engine in the front, why wouldn't they just pick up a Corvette? Specifically the C6 Z06, or hell even the new base stingray like mentioned above. This is supposed to be a "specialty" car and "track oriented" but the corvette will do literally everything better than this, at a similar price. Dumb.
Old 03-28-2013, 05:55 AM
  #19  
Registered User

 
deepbluejh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by liquid_helix136
I dont understand the point of this car. If someone wanted a light(er)weight car from GM with a big engine in the front, why wouldn't they just pick up a Corvette? Specifically the C6 Z06, or hell even the new base stingray like mentioned above. This is supposed to be a "specialty" car and "track oriented" but the corvette will do literally everything better than this, at a similar price. Dumb.
I see this car for people with a sentimental affection toward Camaros. 99% of the time spent driving this car won't be spent on a racetrack, so the track times won't matter too much.
Old 03-28-2013, 06:42 AM
  #20  

 
JonBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 19,712
Received 234 Likes on 165 Posts
Default

This is still a 2+2 so, technically, it's able to have 4 people inside. That's a bonus for dad's with a penchant for speed and track days....that happen to have kids.


Quick Reply: 2014 Camaro Z28



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:19 PM.