2007 CRX ?
02-16-2005, 05:24 AM
#11
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm all for the CRX coming back. I owned a 1991 Si and it was an amazing car when it came out. Great little engine and good handling with the front/rear double wishbone suspension.
Truly a classic in my eyes.
Truly a classic in my eyes.
Nicely done. That looks great.
02-16-2005, 11:18 AM
#13
Originally Posted by YBS1' date='Feb 15 2005, 07:24 PM
I think they both look sharp, except for that uh...aerodynamic downforce device. Even that isn't so bad, I just think the center oriented mounting posts look ricey.
02-16-2005, 01:57 PM
#16
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 4,535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 330R' date='Feb 16 2005, 12:22 PM
hmm.. link me to the other three threads showing this photoshop job??
It's the incessant creation of topic upon topic about the same car when there have already been 3 others in the last 10-12 days.
02-16-2005, 02:14 PM
#17
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Calabasas, CA
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I really don't understand the CRX obsession - unless it is insanely lighter than the '06 Si, what would you gain? Minus two seats?
To me, the new Si is the real deal (great looks, 200hp, LSD). Hope it is not over 2800 lbs.
To me, the new Si is the real deal (great looks, 200hp, LSD). Hope it is not over 2800 lbs.
02-16-2005, 03:11 PM
#18
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 330R' date='Feb 16 2005, 12:18 PM
The production model Si will have the same rear wing design, but will sit much lower to the trunk (the posts will probably be gone).
02-16-2005, 03:41 PM
#19
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: In the heart of the USSA!
Posts: 7,029
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by SDosMil' date='Feb 16 2005, 05:14 PM
I really don't understand the CRX obsession - unless it is insanely lighter than the '06 Si, what would you gain? Minus two seats?
02-16-2005, 04:14 PM
#20
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: CA.WA.[TX].VA
Posts: 2,657
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by CG' date='Feb 16 2005, 04:41 PM
The CRX's were lighter, quicker, and shorter than the Civic's of their day and they were a blast to corner or dodge cones with. They were also easier to park and could haul a great deal of stuff. Heck, I even moved twice and was able to carry everything but my bed in my 84 CRX. My crew cab diesel truck is my "family hauler," for my daily driver I don't want or need a back seat. If they could make it 6 to 10 inches shorter and shave 200 pounds with the same power it would be great.