Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

2007 Boxster S First Drive - not by me.

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-23-2006, 06:43 AM
  #11  
Registered User
 
bjohnston's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern Part of Heaven
Posts: 1,809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Mmmmmm...Boxster S. I LOVE this car now. I think it's gonna have to be my next sports car. But, by the time I'm looking to purchase, it will probably be 3.6L with 330+ h.p. That would be even better. A 3.0L base (with 270ish h.p.) and 3.6L S would be perfection.
Old 08-23-2006, 06:46 AM
  #12  
CG
Registered User

 
CG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: In the heart of the USSA!
Posts: 7,029
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

roll bar (referring to the car in the video)? Is this something different?
Old 08-23-2006, 06:53 AM
  #13  

 
JonBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 19,712
Received 234 Likes on 165 Posts
Default

Great. They're now as powerful as a ten year old NSX that has .2L less displacement. They're also $20K cheaper, which is what the NSX should've been (and about where it started)...

Sorry, I had to throw that in there. This is actually the car (well, the Cayman is, I guess) that is the "replacement" for the NSX as far as I can tell. A Boxster S seems to be about the perfect sports car that's moderately affordable - drop top, refined, powerful, moderately quick, great handling, decent looking, and apparently reliable. Me wants one.
Old 08-23-2006, 07:03 AM
  #14  
Former Moderator

Thread Starter
 
Poindexter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Burlington, VT
Posts: 24,162
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

It makes me look forward to the DragonBall Run even more
Old 08-23-2006, 07:18 AM
  #15  
Registered User

 
PsychoBen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Chowdah-town, MA
Posts: 7,687
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Iceman1,Aug 23 2006, 09:35 AM
you also get much more trunk and storage space in the Cayman.
That's just another masterpiece that Porsche marketing depatment came up with to discern Cayman from Boxster. To fully use the quoted 4 sq. ft add'l storage space, the stuff would have to be piled up and block the view to rear windshield. Boxster also has that storage space (or 90% of it) when top is up, but it is not counted. Even when top is down, there's still a cubby hole in that space for storage - again, not counted. Storage is so plentiful in either car so it is kind of moot...
Old 08-23-2006, 08:53 AM
  #16  
Registered User
 
Dr. WOT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Easton
Posts: 5,642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Smart move by Porsche, they prolly save costs by condensing their produciton line, yet can charge more money.

All they hype about the Cayman being a seperate model, they really are the best Marketing company in the world. They do make good cars too.
Old 08-23-2006, 08:57 AM
  #17  
Registered User
 
PLYRS 3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Erock's my boat!
Posts: 23,749
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dr. WOT,Aug 23 2006, 12:53 PM
They do make good cars too.
funny how that's the LAST thing the thread poster said.



consumers are really understanding the game.
Old 08-23-2006, 09:26 AM
  #18  
Registered User
 
Iceman1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PsychoBen,Aug 23 2006, 10:18 AM
That's just another masterpiece that Porsche marketing depatment came up with to discern Cayman from Boxster. To fully use the quoted 4 sq. ft add'l storage space, the stuff would have to be piled up and block the view to rear windshield. Boxster also has that storage space (or 90% of it) when top is up, but it is not counted. Even when top is down, there's still a cubby hole in that space for storage - again, not counted. Storage is so plentiful in either car so it is kind of moot...
rear trunk space seemed more usable in the cayman
Old 08-23-2006, 09:39 AM
  #19  
Registered User

 
S2000380's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: sicklerville
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Boxter = Poor mans's Porsche
Old 08-23-2006, 10:26 AM
  #20  
Registered User
 
DVDoughboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by S2000380,Aug 23 2006, 11:39 AM
Boxter = Poor mans's Porsche
That's a terrible comment.

I'm not a big Porsche fan but I still have a lot of respect for the Boxster/Cayman S. And if you talk about pricing, there is no such thing as a poor man's Porsche.


Quick Reply: 2007 Boxster S First Drive - not by me.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:18 AM.