2005 Acura RL
#91
Registered User
Went and looked at it with the whole family 2 weekends ago. I honestly did not see a big difference in the interior size between the RL & TL. My parents liked the RL's chrome trim, amber lights, but could not understand the massive price difference. I got to agree with them on this one. AWD, Nav., chrome trim, and amber lights are not worth $15K. These cars are just so similar in size. We adjusted the seats for a 5'9" person (me) front & back in both cars, and both had good space. We took a drive with an automatic TL (it will be for my mom) and it was a very pleasant car. The RL was very similar. If we get an Acura it will be the TL. Although compared to the E320 or 525/530 the RL does make good financial sense, and the interior is very nice. Nice rich wood textures, the leather is very soft.
#92
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: San Jose
Posts: 735
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#93
Former Moderator
Nice review. I drove it and loved it. I drove the 6 cylinder 5 series and E class, and just couldnt justify the huge price difference (equally equipped)
I love everything about the car, so Ill have it next month.
I love everything about the car, so Ill have it next month.
#94
Registered User
Originally Posted by NFRs2000NYC,Nov 13 2004, 12:31 AM
Nice review. I drove it and loved it. I drove the 6 cylinder 5 series and E class, and just couldnt justify the huge price difference (equally equipped)
I love everything about the car, so Ill have it next month.
I love everything about the car, so Ill have it next month.
#95
Nice review. I drove it and loved it. I drove the 6 cylinder 5 series and E class, and just couldnt justify the huge price difference (equally equipped)
If you can afford a 50k RL why is 53k suddenly overpriced?
#97
Registered User
Originally Posted by steve c,Nov 13 2004, 06:47 PM
I don't get it. I price out 530's with similar options (even some you can't get on the RL like active cruise control) and it comes out around 53 (I'm sure a dealer would go 2-3k off MSRP).
If you can afford a 50k RL why is 53k suddenly overpriced?
If you can afford a 50k RL why is 53k suddenly overpriced?
I just priced out a 530 with similar options and I'm at $61,165 and that's WITHOUT active cruise control.
I wonder how we're coming up with such a large difference?
Also, why exactly are we using a clearly underpowered 530 with 225hp as a comparison?
#98
I do. Many people these days will overlook perceived image for undeniably superior reliability.
I just priced out a 530 with similar options and I'm at $61,165 and that's WITHOUT active cruise control.
I wonder how we're coming up with such a large difference?
I wonder how we're coming up with such a large difference?
Also, why exactly are we using a clearly underpowered 530 with 225hp as a comparison?
#99
Registered User
Originally Posted by steve c,Nov 13 2004, 07:22 PM
The RL has been out for a month and it has UNDENIABLY better reliability? Please. Put down the anti-domestic drum.
You are doing something wrong.
Despite having 225hp the BMW 530 is in a dead heat with the RL in terms of acceleration. Why is that? Could be the fact that the RL is a 4000+ pound pig ...
You are doing something wrong.
Despite having 225hp the BMW 530 is in a dead heat with the RL in terms of acceleration. Why is that? Could be the fact that the RL is a 4000+ pound pig ...
Oh yeah...I forgot for a second that I'm actually talking to steve c. Your opinion is almost always correct, you're all knowing, and you never make mistakes so by logical deduction I must be doing something wrong.
I could care less about the weight with regards to luxo-barges that I wouldn't even consider owning in the first place. If you want to sit here and beat your private little drum that somehow magically while being a Honda product the RL is too new to fit in to its reliability legacy then you go right ahead.
#100
I could care less about the weight with regards to luxo-barges that I wouldn't even consider owning in the first place.
The only thing I am biased about is correcting stupidity with fact.