Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

2004 S4 or 2004 M3...

Thread Tools
 
Old 05-20-2004 | 07:49 PM
  #31  
steve c's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 6,792
Likes: 4
Default

Ehh neither, both are porkers.
Old 05-20-2004 | 08:00 PM
  #32  
VTEC_Junkie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,709
Likes: 1
From: Berkeley
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by jwkim
Old 05-20-2004 | 08:03 PM
  #33  
VTEC_Junkie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,709
Likes: 1
From: Berkeley
Default

Originally posted by steve c
Ehh neither, both are porkers.

c'mon, you're trying to tell me that neigther ferarris or lamborghinis are working buying either because those cars are porkers as well??
Old 05-20-2004 | 08:11 PM
  #34  
steve c's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 6,792
Likes: 4
Default

c'mon, you're trying to tell me that neigther ferarris or lamborghinis are working buying either because those cars are porkers as well??
So now we are comparing Audi/VW's and BMW's to Italian exotics?
Old 05-20-2004 | 09:23 PM
  #35  
VTEC_Junkie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,709
Likes: 1
From: Berkeley
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by steve c
Old 05-22-2004 | 10:23 AM
  #36  
TwiBlueG35's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
From: Bell
Default

M3. The only A4 worth to buy is 1.8T in my opinion.
Old 05-24-2004 | 04:19 AM
  #37  
under-rated's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,734
Likes: 2
From: Seattle
Default

Originally posted by steve c
Ehh neither, both are porkers.
They're both awesome cars. Looks goes to the M3... all the way. Performance M3.

As for shitty weather conditions depending on where you live S4, I'm not attracted to four door sedans and I liked the 00-02 S4's far better than the 04's.
Old 05-24-2004 | 07:56 AM
  #38  
vroom's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 946
Likes: 1
From: NOVA/SI NY
Default

Isn't the E46 M3 more like 3400 lbs,a nd the Audi something like 3800lbs? 3400 is kind of heavy, 3800 is bordering on rediculus IF you use the car as a sports car - as a Grand tourer, who cares?
Old 05-24-2004 | 08:12 AM
  #39  
MDXLuvr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,281
Likes: 0
From: N. Tx.
Default

M3- 3475 lbs. S4- Not sure.

btw, here is C&D opinionLINK
Old 05-24-2004 | 11:01 PM
  #40  
SonShine's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix
Default

I've driven both as well since I've been considering my options as my lease for my MY01 comes up in a couple of months. Personally, I would get an M3 if space was not a consideration. Then again, the S4 has a pretty small back seat, so the main advantage in space is that you have the back two doors to get stuff (or kids) in and out of the car.

The one thing that also appears clear is that M3 leases are superior to S4 leases because the residual value is much higher for BMWs, and therefore you pay less depreciation (= less $$ payments).

I don't think you can go wrong with either car - they both have the same maintenance warranty too, so cost of ownership in the first 4 yrs/50K miles is not that high overall.


Quick Reply: 2004 S4 or 2004 M3...



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:36 PM.