Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

2004 Crossfire SRT-6

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-18-2003, 09:11 AM
  #1  

Thread Starter
 
NJTom2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Red Bank
Posts: 868
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 2004 Crossfire SRT-6

"The Crossfire SRT-6 will pump 330 horsepower and go zero to 60 mph in just over five seconds. In a video Chrysler showed, the Crossfire SRT-6 bested the Porsche Boxster. The two-seat convertible Roadster edition will follow."

SRT-6 in May, convertible in September

Info taken from The Car Connection:
http://www.thecarconnection.com/index.asp?article=6617

I'm a fan of the looks of the crossfire, I've always thought it needed a power boost.

For those of us that auto-x. Add another to the list of AS/BS cars for next year.

Don't forget those big stock wheels.
Old 11-18-2003, 09:30 AM
  #2  

 
QUIKAG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Dallas
Posts: 9,396
Received 427 Likes on 238 Posts
Default

What motor does it have? Out of the SLK32AMG???
Old 11-18-2003, 01:57 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
Nin009's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,637
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Leave it to Chrysler to introduce the convertible in September.
Old 11-18-2003, 02:52 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
Optikal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bellevue
Posts: 1,903
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sounds like a major performance improvement! Though they need to get rid of some of the over-styled design elements (blah)
Old 11-19-2003, 06:22 AM
  #5  

Thread Starter
 
NJTom2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Red Bank
Posts: 868
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Old 11-19-2003, 06:32 AM
  #6  

 
wing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 7,620
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

It's too fat, really does look like the SLK though.
Old 11-19-2003, 07:21 AM
  #7  
Registered User
 
shaundesjardins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i don't know about those hood "lines". Just plain fugly to me.
Old 11-19-2003, 08:27 AM
  #8  
Registered User
 
Optikal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bellevue
Posts: 1,903
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Did the vert model get rid of the squatting toad look from the back end?
Old 11-19-2003, 09:54 AM
  #9  
Registered User

 
PedalFaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 6,014
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally posted by wing
It's too fat
It's actually a pretty compact car -- for reference, it's two and a half inches shorter than the S2000. It's heavier than our car at 3061 lbs. for the base model, but that's in line with the Z4 and considerably less than the 350Z...

Steve
Old 11-19-2003, 09:57 AM
  #10  
Former Moderator

 
The Gasman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ventura, California, USA
Posts: 59,195
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I like it. I wouldn't buy it, but I like it.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
wantone
The S2000 Gallery
30
08-14-2003 04:43 AM
wantone
The S2000 Gallery
47
03-19-2003 04:49 AM
ElTianti
Car and Bike Talk
12
08-28-2002 04:31 PM
Indecision
S2000 Talk
42
08-27-2002 08:26 AM



Quick Reply: 2004 Crossfire SRT-6



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:22 PM.