Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

'08 MB C63 AMG v '07 Audi RS 4 v '08 BMW M3

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-27-2007, 01:42 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
xupthree60's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

ill take an m coupe please (the old z3 based one) the only car that ever sold with styling that was edgy and the only car they have ever sold that takes less than 10 years before it looks sporty.
Old 10-27-2007, 03:17 PM
  #12  
Former Moderator

 
CKit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,730
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

[QUOTE]An aggressive right foot generates can
Old 10-27-2007, 03:37 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
Iceman1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dombey,Oct 27 2007, 01:02 PM
but it definitely sounds like the car you'd wanna drive for fun, of the 3 (wild burnouts, loud as hell, monstrous torque, 10 mpg-ha).
i guess that depends on the driver... to me "more fun" is being able to dance with a car on the corner's than mashing the gas and getting gobs of torque to hook up...

all props to MB for the excellant transmission, power output and a better handling car than the previous model...

but its still not an M3... not yet...

i agree more people may indeed prefer the C63... but that just means more people just want brute power and an easy-to-mash-the-gas car than something that is more challenging like the M3... the buying demographic is differnet, to an extent...
Old 10-27-2007, 03:51 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
Fanman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Glendale
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I would take the C63. Love the highway missles.
Old 10-27-2007, 05:50 PM
  #15  

 
cbehney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: No VA
Posts: 2,687
Received 16 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Iceman1,Oct 27 2007, 06:37 PM
i guess that depends on the driver... to me "more fun" is being able to dance with a car on the corner's than mashing the gas and getting gobs of torque to hook up...

all props to MB for the excellant transmission, power output and a better handling car than the previous model...

but its still not an M3... not yet...

i agree more people may indeed prefer the C63... but that just means more people just want brute power and an easy-to-mash-the-gas car than something that is more challenging like the M3... the buying demographic is differnet, to an extent...
My guess is that the buying demographic has a huge overlap, and that the majority of buyers for both the C63 and the M3 will be somewhere between indifferent and uninformed about the differences you state. Many or most will buy one vs. the other for reasons unrelated to "mashing" vs "challenging."


Old 10-27-2007, 05:55 PM
  #16  
Registered User
 
Onehots2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Orlando
Posts: 6,536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cbehney,Oct 27 2007, 05:50 PM
My guess is that the buying demographic has a huge overlap, and that the majority of buyers for both the C63 and the M3 will be somewhere between indifferent and uninformed about the differences you state. Many or most will buy one vs. the other for reasons unrelated to "mashing" vs "challenging."
Okay, the M3 pulled a 4.3 to 60 and the C63 did 3.9seconds. BMW's DCT-tranny is guaranteed to shed a few tenths off that figure.
Old 10-27-2007, 06:48 PM
  #17  

 
cbehney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: No VA
Posts: 2,687
Received 16 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Onehots2k,Oct 27 2007, 08:55 PM
Okay, the M3 pulled a 4.3 to 60 and the C63 did 3.9seconds. BMW's DCT-tranny is guaranteed to shed a few tenths off that figure.

Probably their actual street numbers will be virtually the same, but even so the C63 will probably still give you more of that rumbling mashing feeling talked about above.

But my point was that a lot of their buyers won't care about actual numbers or handling feel etc. They'll probably decide on looks, or Benz vs Bimmer or best deal they can get etc. My opinion only.



Old 10-27-2007, 06:52 PM
  #18  
Registered User
 
dombey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Scottsdale
Posts: 2,330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Onehots2k,Oct 27 2007, 05:55 PM
Okay, the M3 pulled a 4.3 to 60 and the C63 did 3.9seconds. BMW's DCT-tranny is guaranteed to shed a few tenths off that figure.
unless it does 60 in first gear, in which case it doesn't really matter, does it?
Old 10-27-2007, 07:01 PM
  #19  

 
Soul Coughing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Chiswick
Posts: 13,485
Received 68 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

the bar has been lifted even further... lets hope i run into one of these guys when i'm running on all cylinders and full boost!

Absolutely beautiful cars!
Old 10-27-2007, 08:26 PM
  #20  
Registered User
 
Onehots2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Orlando
Posts: 6,536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=cbehney,Oct 27 2007, 06:48 PM]

Probably their actual street numbers will be virtually the same, but even so the C63 will probably still give you more of that rumbling mashing feeling talked about above.

But my point was that a lot of their buyers won't care about actual numbers or handling feel etc.


Quick Reply: '08 MB C63 AMG v '07 Audi RS 4 v '08 BMW M3



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:36 PM.