Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

02 Firebird ws6

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-03-2006, 02:03 PM
  #21  
Registered User
 
brockLT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,393
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Im 6-2 and I fit fine in my Camaro
Old 03-03-2006, 02:43 PM
  #22  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
jackalope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Brazoria
Posts: 1,351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think these are some of the ugliest cars ever made. What are they, 200" long riding on a 98" wheel base? I think that gives them a 5' front overhang. Also, build quality appears to me to be lousy (panel gaps, interior materials, etc.). Now, I love a big Murican V8 as much as the next guy, but I'd try to scrape together enough dough for an LS2 GTO. A lightly used example of those ('05) could be found for around $25K, I would think. They're nothing great to look at either, but at least they're not offensively ugly like the Firebird WS6. Build quality seems far better, space efficiency is better (trunk notwithstanding), LS2 is better, and it has an IRS.
believe, me its on the list. my buddy has an 04, and I like the interior quite a bit, but the looks and the handling characteristics throw me off (not to mention the shifter with throws a mile long)
Old 03-04-2006, 05:44 AM
  #23  

 
JonBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 19,712
Received 234 Likes on 165 Posts
Default

Decent car. The guy I bought my 944S from had one and it was just as fast. It was modified, as was the Porsche. The Porsche was putting out 279 whp/301 ft-lb and the WS6 was putting out 330 whp/380 ft/lbs (or thereabouts - too lazy to look it up) and they were equally fast on the track, despite the WS6 being a few hundred pounds heavier.

So, very quick car that can be made to handle decently (lots of rubber and upgraded brakes are especially important).
Old 03-04-2006, 02:24 PM
  #24  
Registered User

 
rockville's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Palo Alto
Posts: 5,387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

JonBoy hit the brakes right on the money. My friend said the biggest issue with his Camaro is over heating the brakes.
Old 03-04-2006, 02:35 PM
  #25  
Registered User
 
steve c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 6,792
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

The 80's fastback Mustangs were better but the later trunk only cars lost the practicality of a hatch.
The issue with the Camaro is that despite it being a big car, it is cramped inside. I am balled up with bad sightlines cut off by the A-pillar and swept back windsheild.

The mustang in comparison has a more pleasant seating position.
Old 03-04-2006, 06:08 PM
  #26  
Registered User

 
rockville's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Palo Alto
Posts: 5,387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by steve c,Mar 4 2006, 03:35 PM
The issue with the Camaro is that despite it being a big car, it is cramped inside. I am balled up with bad sightlines cut off by the A-pillar and swept back windsheild.

The mustang in comparison has a more pleasant seating position.
For my self (6' tall and prefer a reclined seating position) I find the interior to have plenty of space. It's been a bit since I've driven the car but I don't recall having any issues with the sight lines. I agree that the car doesn't have much space given it's footprint but compared to most 2-door sporty/sports cars it has quite a bit of cargo space.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
VilleS2K
Car and Bike Talk
110
09-29-2017 09:28 AM
jon3501447
S2000 Racing and Competition
55
08-12-2010 08:06 PM
02s2k01s4
Car and Bike Talk
8
02-04-2007 03:57 PM
alexpilot
Car Talk - Non S2000
25
09-04-2006 05:10 AM
stedge
S2000 Racing and Competition
22
10-03-2002 04:45 PM



Quick Reply: 02 Firebird ws6



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:46 PM.