What just happened at the Oscars?
03-08-2010, 03:20 PM
#52
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by S2Koupe,Mar 8 2010, 02:32 PM
having thought about it, i also think ingloroious was a much better screenplay. besides, HL was adapted from a previous magazine article, im not sure that really should count as original screenplay. i dunno tho. i just dont think ppl wanted to see QT blather on stage....
i dunno, i didnt see the blind side. seemed like a kind of one sided after school special type movie, but perhaps she did a good job? enough to garner respect from "the academy"? there definitely seemed like some heavy hitters on the best female nom list.
i dunno, i didnt see the blind side. seemed like a kind of one sided after school special type movie, but perhaps she did a good job? enough to garner respect from "the academy"? there definitely seemed like some heavy hitters on the best female nom list.
No one could have pulled off Julia Childs like Meryl Streep and no one could have played the Countess like Helen Mirren. You're snubbing two of the best actresses in history because everyone fell in love with a feel-good puff piece with a role that twenty other women in Hollywood could have played. It's just outlandish to me to even suggest that Sandra Bullock is a halfway decent actress. She collected a Razzie award the night before for Christ's sake!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post