S2PIDSTYLE

There is alot of talk about design here when it comes to human beings. As i sit here and think of all the differences that we have when it comes to

Skin color
Hair color
Height
and even F'ing blood type

I dont understand why all the people who believe in "God" cannot believe that "God" makes alot of things and humans different, and that you should be accepting of them all.

Lets not forget about these things to (or does the bible say to turn a blind on on these as well?):

Anencephaly
Apert syndrome
Atrial septal defect
Birth marks
Bladder exstrophy
Cleft lip
Cleft palate
Clubfoot
Craniosynostosis
Crouzon syndrome
Cystic fibrosis
Deafness
DiGeorge syndrome
Down syndrome
Encephaloceles
Genital ambiguity
Genitourinary birth defects
Glaucoma, congenital
Hearing loss
Heart defects
Hemangioma
Hemophilia
Hydrocephalus
Hydronephrosis
Hypospadias
Klinefelter syndrome (XXY)
Macular stains
Marfan syndrome
Muscular dystrophy
Neural tube defects
Neuromuscular diseases
Osteopetrosis
Patent ductus arteriosus
Patent foramen ovale
Pfeiffer syndrome
Polycystic kidney disease (PKD)
Port wine stains
Renal agenesis
Rett syndrome
Saethre-Chotzen syndrome
Sickle cell disease
Spina bifida
Tay-Sachs disease (infantile form)
Tetralogy of Fallot
Transposition of the great arteries
Undescended Testicle
Ventricular septal defect
Vesicoureteral reflux, primary
XXY (Klinefelter syndrome)

Nicotunes

They are not trying to "save a buck", they are trying to be covered by insurance, etc.

hapybrian

I am sensitive when people call me hypocrite and I don't know why.


Just because I say I'm born with a natural attraction to girls
does not mean that I must concede that gays are naturally attracted
to the same sex. There's no logical jump to that conclusion.

The question "why can't gays be born with a natural attraction to (the same sex)"
is important, yes. If we assume that a disposition for being attracted to the same sex is entirely genetic, then that disposition would have been bred out a long time ago, because it cannot be propagated! For an extreme example, let's say that homosexual males are always born without a penis. If this is a genetic trait, how can the genes that cause it be propagated? They can't. Thus, if there were a genetic mutation that causes such a feature, it would not survive. The mutated penisless man can't propagate his genes, and that mutation would disappear. The only way to propagate the trait would be for a homosexual to deny his feelings and procreate with a female--denying his "true" feelings. If his desire for procreation is stronger than his frilly man-love, apparently he wasn't all that homosexual after-all. In either case, the propensity would eventually die out, and that would be the end of homosexuality. Since homosexuality has clearly not died out, it is obvious that it is not based entirely on genetics.

Nicotunes

Marriage has NOTHING TO DO with procreation in the REAL WORLD

Look how many marriages are childless and happy.

smirfs2k05

Man zack first your a racist now your discriminate gays.. tsk tsk


BAN HIM BAN HIM =]

S2PIDSTYLE

plenty of heterosexual marry for financial and insurance reasons to. but its ok, they may have children some day

Nicotunes

Let's kill everyone with these and clean up the gene pool!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!





j/k of course

Nicotunes

Sorry dude......

hapybrian

No, one of the professors in the latest movie is..
(the character, not the actor. Stupid author trying to foist
her liberal pinko views off on society by wrapping it in a children's
novel, if you ask me. It was not a natural obvious placement of
a character who just happened to be gay, either. Clearly the
author had a social agenda.)

if you google it, I think you'll find a ton of stuff...

Nicotunes

I contend that that is either hypocritical or discriminatory.

It's OK for YOU to be naturally attracted to a particular sex, but not for gays to be.

See my point?