Democrats takes over the Republicans!
#263
Originally Posted by rworne,Nov 10 2006, 08:13 AM
The free speech zone at the 2004 Democratic National Convention.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_speech_zone
I'm not going to claim the Repubs are innocent of this too, but the Dems are just as guilty at attacking 1st Amendment rights.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_speech_zone
I'm not going to claim the Repubs are innocent of this too, but the Dems are just as guilty at attacking 1st Amendment rights.
"They are based on U.S. court decisions stipulating that the government may regulate the time and place -- but not content -- of expression"
Supreme Court or lower courts?
#264
Originally Posted by rworne,Nov 9 2006, 11:41 PM
Damn right. I hate those bastards that caged up people and tried to put down free speech:
#265
OMG..........
"The Bush administration has been criticized by columnist James Bovard of The American Conservative for requiring protestors to stay within a designated area, while allowing supporters access to more areas. According to the Chicago Tribune, the American Civil Liberties Union has asked a federal court in Washington D.C. to prevent the Secret Service from keeping anti-Bush protesters distant from presidential appearances while allowing supporters to display their messages up close, where they are likely to be seen by the news media. Regarding free speech zones, U. S. District Court Judge Douglas Woodlock has commented that "One cannot conceive of what other design elements could be put into a space to create a more symbolic affront to the role of free expression."
You rock, Judge Woodlock.
"The Bush administration has been criticized by columnist James Bovard of The American Conservative for requiring protestors to stay within a designated area, while allowing supporters access to more areas. According to the Chicago Tribune, the American Civil Liberties Union has asked a federal court in Washington D.C. to prevent the Secret Service from keeping anti-Bush protesters distant from presidential appearances while allowing supporters to display their messages up close, where they are likely to be seen by the news media. Regarding free speech zones, U. S. District Court Judge Douglas Woodlock has commented that "One cannot conceive of what other design elements could be put into a space to create a more symbolic affront to the role of free expression."
You rock, Judge Woodlock.
#266
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: San Fernando Valley, CA
Posts: 3,962
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
6 Posts
[QUOTE=Nicotunes,Nov 10 2006, 09:07 AM] You neglected to mention that they also had one at the 2004 Republican Convention in NYC.....but I appreciate you not claiming the Republicans are innocent
#269
Originally Posted by rworne,Nov 10 2006, 10:08 AM
In 1984 I got to see Ronald Reagan at Pierce College on his re-election campaign. There was a knot of leftist protesters surrounded by a very friendly (to Reagan) crowd. One of these guys was behind me, who got separated from the crowd and was set upon by a Reagan supporter who grabbed his sign and tried to rip it up. This resulted in a scuffle. I separated the two and handed the sign back to the protester and told the Reagan supporter to knock it off. I then got back to enjoying the rally.
You rock for getting involved.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
B.C.
California - Southern California S2000 Owners
115
12-29-2006 09:22 AM
kelvin96gsr
Pacific Northwest S2000 Owners
11
10-19-2006 05:46 PM
B.C.
California - Southern California S2000 Owners
10
09-13-2006 11:27 AM
The Woman
UK & Ireland Meets & Events - Past
141
05-27-2006 05:42 AM