California - Bay Area S2000 Owners California Bay Area S2000 Owners Group

Should I Do It? T_T torn....

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-19-2007, 09:53 PM
  #31  

 
Dan H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: San Francisco/San Jose
Posts: 798
Received 14 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by WashabiS2K' date='Mar 19 2007, 09:46 PM
it is MY car, but i tend to get lazy and end up driving my dad's BMW around plus, my dad would rather me drive his BMW around than my s2k, iono why..
I know what you mean. I have my parent's old BMW that I drive around in crowded parking lots in SF. Its dieing out though and they need a new beater. My dad got pissed when someone put a ding in my S2K. LOL
Old 03-19-2007, 10:17 PM
  #32  
Registered User
 
K2Rhiro255's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by WashabiS2K' date='Mar 19 2007, 09:28 PM
the reason i was looking into this trade was mostly the fact that i could do a straight trade, then trade the FD for a used NSX
Why don't you just trade for NSX? I don't see any point trading with FD for. FD is not reliable, really need a lot of attention to maintain, won't pass smog, etc. If that's going to be a TRACK car, might be good but you really need to tune a lot to compete with S2000.

Well, goodluck.
Old 03-19-2007, 10:27 PM
  #33  
Registered User

 
an_orange_s2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 6,909
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

No one never gets satisfied with what they have. Especially when you are young. Just doesn't know how to appreciate what they have.
im all with hiro on that statement...sometimes i forget that im 18 and drive a s2000, especially since im 18 i have to be humble about it.
Old 03-19-2007, 10:53 PM
  #34  
Registered User
 
CuOnGeE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 2,032
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dan H' date='Mar 19 2007, 09:33 PM
these cars require a lot of attention.
Old 03-19-2007, 11:50 PM
  #35  
Registered User

 
Eluded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: unknown
Posts: 2,214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I know it is late and I'm a little drunk but I must be seeing things. IMHO the s2000 is Honda
Old 03-19-2007, 11:54 PM
  #36  
Registered User
 
CuOnGeE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 2,032
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Eluded' date='Mar 19 2007, 11:50 PM
I know it is late and I'm a little drunk but I must be seeing things.
Old 03-20-2007, 12:01 AM
  #37  
Registered User

 
an_orange_s2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 6,909
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Old 03-20-2007, 05:54 AM
  #38  
Registered User
 
Sfkn2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 3,446
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I wouldn't do it. Someone offered me a deal like that when I had my Prelude, but I checked the maintenance costs on the FD. It gets pretty crazy.
Old 03-20-2007, 09:43 AM
  #39  
Registered User

 
s4play's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: West Coast baby
Posts: 9,447
Received 15 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

I have no experience whatsoever with the FD cars so what I'm going to say is based on my turbo experiene with other cars and the s2k of course.

Any used cars have risk and buying a modded used turbo car is even riskier. At one point I was going to buy a MKIV Supra but it's hard to find one that's either cleanly modded or stock. Rotary engines are notarious for being a money pit and you won't recover any costs from it for sure. As for keepin it and then selling it later, I'm pretty sure the s2k will hold its value far better!

The FD has a very narrow limited used market, even smaller than an s2000 due to the turbo motor. I would say keep the s2k and supercharge it or otherwise just get an NSX later.

I know many people here will shoot me for it but I personally do NOT think the NSX is an upgrade from an s2000....it's an old car and is no faster than a blown s2k and look wise it's purely judgemental.....


good luck either way,
rick
Old 03-20-2007, 09:44 AM
  #40  
Registered User

 
2wheelsmoker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I've been considering the FD and NSX for a while, almost interchangeably. Stock for stock, the performance seems damn similar. Now, when you take into account the amount of money it takes to make these cars absolute monsters, the FD would be cheaper overall to get the performance we all dream of. Modified the FD would be the better candidate for money and performance. The NSX is more expensive in every respect (even if the rotary needs to be rebuilt) to make it go faster but you're paying for the RELIABILITY and HASSLE-FREE nature of the car.

So I like to think of the stock cars as being almost exactly the same in terms of performance and both are gorgeous cars to me and I'd be happy with either of them. But you need to consider what you want more out of the car in the long term, performance or reliability.

Keep in mind that stock for stock, the S2000's performance isn't too far off the NSX or FD. I've seen good drivers bring out the best in almost all kinds of cars so trust me when I say that in non-professional hands the performance is stunning for any of these cars. If you're doing it only for looks and feel, I can't help you there. Good luck with your decision!


Quick Reply: Should I Do It? T_T torn....



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:22 PM.