California - Bay Area S2000 Owners California Bay Area S2000 Owners Group

OEM OR MUGEN REPLICA?

Thread Tools
 
Old 09-19-2009 | 03:16 PM
  #11  
S2K_408's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,945
Likes: 0
From: San Jose/BAY AREA
Default

My friend has a authentic mugen if you are interested! Pm me!
Old 09-19-2009 | 04:58 PM
  #12  
still's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,474
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by faukengenius,Sep 19 2009, 10:06 AM
authentic mugen or oem only. I'd stay away from the replica's.
Old 09-20-2009 | 12:18 AM
  #13  
shehatezme's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 754
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
Default

Originally Posted by chViETnk,Sep 18 2009, 11:27 PM
i went from a replica mugen(vis brand) to a oem hardtop. in terms of quality i would go with the oem unless you have the money to spend on a authentic mugen hardtop.

replica mugen = too much wind noise, ghetto hardware unless you buy oem ones. plastic rear window. might leak

oem = better vision, less noise, glass window

i would rock both but defiantly wouldnt go back to a replica mugen hardtop over the oem and like itS2Krazy said, if you have less mods, go for oem, mugen looks weird if your not fixed up.
Couldn't agree more. I ended up buying OEM hardware for my replica CF top. Now i need to invest in some new OEM windows molding to try to get rid of the wind noise. If I had to do it again, I would get an OEM top.

Speaking of which, I am willing to sell my CF replica mugen top for $1,200. It needs some new Window molding for it to fully work though.
Old 09-21-2009 | 04:55 PM
  #14  
623baller's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 558
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Default

oem if your car is more along the lines of subtle /clean modded

mugen if it's more on the aggressive side
Old 09-21-2009 | 08:51 PM
  #15  
jwyoung's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
Default

I'll buy your soft top if it makes your decision any easier. only if it's glass of coursE!
Old 09-22-2009 | 12:36 PM
  #16  
s2k925's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
From: All over the bay..
Default

Speaking of which, I am willing to sell my CF replica mugen top for $1,200. It needs some new Window molding for it to fully work though.
hmmmm.. Can you specify whats needed?
Old 09-22-2009 | 12:47 PM
  #17  
chViETnk's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,158
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
Default

Originally Posted by s2k925,Sep 22 2009, 12:36 PM
hmmmm.. Can you specify whats needed?
replica comes with cheapo black fat stripes that hold on by double sided tape that dont hold up that well.
Old 09-22-2009 | 12:54 PM
  #18  
bjeong1381's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,808
Likes: 1
From: Bay Area
Default

Originally Posted by slightly2ned,Sep 19 2009, 02:25 AM
The Mugen HT is aero tested & lighter - not just for looks. Mugen original > OEM.
Mugen FRP and oem actually weigh just about the same. Mugen CF is lighter though.
Old 09-22-2009 | 01:16 PM
  #19  
slightly2ned's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 8,527
Likes: 1
From: Yee!
Default

Originally Posted by bjeong1381,Sep 22 2009, 12:54 PM
Mugen FRP and oem actually weigh just about the same. Mugen CF is lighter though.
I beg to differ from my experience (ive ran both on the car). There is a significant weight difference between the OEM & Mugen. The glass & lining alone probably contribute to atleast 8-10lbs. The CF version is definitely lighter than the FRP
Old 09-22-2009 | 01:21 PM
  #20  
faukengenius's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 5,888
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco
Default

^ I agree with jp. I was able to take the mugen top off on my own. I didn't even wanna try with the oem one. After stripping down an oem top I can definately say that it's around the ballpark of 8-10lbs difference between the to.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:43 PM.