California - Bay Area S2000 Owners California Bay Area S2000 Owners Group

Gas Prices...

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-02-2012 | 12:45 AM
  #11  
yamez's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,954
Likes: 0
From: fourzeroeight
Default

i just finished putting gas on my e36. $68.83 cents.... /GG i guess i have to eat top ramen for the whole week in order to get to work.
Old 03-02-2012 | 12:48 AM
  #12  
danvuquoc's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,282
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Thateguhate
Originally Posted by eklipz98' timestamp='1330665007' post='21468597
[quote name='rob-2' timestamp='1330656474' post='21468245']
I'm happy to see fuel rise.
...seems to me gas is under priced...
You sir, are the minority in your opinion here.
Yeah I would have to agree. I don't make an assload of money so to throw that much more at these oil companies doesn't please me one bit but all in all I have to do it. I do cut back on my spirited driving though to save money from my commute. I've even debated getting a subtle rear diffuser for one because I like the look but it also serves a purpose that might save a few cents a week.
[/quote]

Not exactly sure a functional rear diffuser is going to help your gas mileage... even if it somehow marginally did -- your break even analysis would likely be in length of decades.
Old 03-02-2012 | 12:53 AM
  #13  
danvuquoc's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,282
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Default

Originally Posted by macr88
Originally Posted by rob-2' timestamp='1330656474' post='21468245
We enjoy some of the cheapest fuel in the world. $60 is nothing, it's what two people spend out for a nights dinner. Nights dinner vs. gas to drive you around for a week - seems to me gas is under priced until it's about $6-7
The problem I have is why we're having to pay so much compared to the rest of the us.
In one way or another, we're paying the same amount as the rest of the world. Wether its at the dollar cost at the pump, or wether its being paid through our taxes to support our military policies to attempt and control oil prices with our supplying countries... we're still paying it
Old 03-02-2012 | 01:08 AM
  #14  
macr88's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 14,849
Likes: 7
From: Emmett
Default

Originally Posted by danvuquoc
Originally Posted by macr88' timestamp='1330674635' post='21468855
[quote name='rob-2' timestamp='1330656474' post='21468245']
We enjoy some of the cheapest fuel in the world. $60 is nothing, it's what two people spend out for a nights dinner. Nights dinner vs. gas to drive you around for a week - seems to me gas is under priced until it's about $6-7
The problem I have is why we're having to pay so much compared to the rest of the us.
In one way or another, we're paying the same amount as the rest of the world. Wether its at the dollar cost at the pump, or wether its being paid through our taxes to support our military policies to attempt and control oil prices with our supplying countries... we're still paying it
[/quote]
The rest of the us we're right below Hawaii and Alaska, what gives. We're getting screwed and I'm sure it's because of some political crap.
Old 03-02-2012 | 01:45 AM
  #15  
kaansahbaz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,861
Likes: 1
From: Morgan Hill,CA
Default

You guys don't have a SUV that gets 15mpg I guess !!! Lol
Old 03-02-2012 | 02:17 AM
  #16  
TougeHorseman's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 8,570
Likes: 9
From: Professor Touge Emeritus
Default

Originally Posted by kaansahbaz
You guys don't have a SUV that gets 15mpg I guess !!! Lol
I practically get that on mountain runs (in the S)!
I guess I drive my car too slow.
Old 03-02-2012 | 07:12 AM
  #17  
rob-2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 8,657
Likes: 170
Default

Originally Posted by macr88
Originally Posted by danvuquoc' timestamp='1330678435' post='21468914
[quote name='macr88' timestamp='1330674635' post='21468855']
[quote name='rob-2' timestamp='1330656474' post='21468245']
We enjoy some of the cheapest fuel in the world. $60 is nothing, it's what two people spend out for a nights dinner. Nights dinner vs. gas to drive you around for a week - seems to me gas is under priced until it's about $6-7
The problem I have is why we're having to pay so much compared to the rest of the us.
In one way or another, we're paying the same amount as the rest of the world. Wether its at the dollar cost at the pump, or wether its being paid through our taxes to support our military policies to attempt and control oil prices with our supplying countries... we're still paying it
[/quote]
The rest of the us we're right below Hawaii and Alaska, what gives. We're getting screwed and I'm sure it's because of some political crap.
[/quote]
California has different refining requirements that make gas more expensive to produce for this market. What happens is the local refineries opt to 'export' the more profitable (non-ca standard blend) gas out of state and this allows them to keep the refineries operating near 100% while reduce the supply to California. Thus increasing the price.

A second factor is the expensive pumps required by law. All of this plus other things go towards increasing the pump price of California gas. It's Amazing to me I can still get 91oc for $3.90gal here in Reno and we get our gas from California!
Old 03-02-2012 | 07:19 AM
  #18  
rob-2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 8,657
Likes: 170
Default

Originally Posted by Thateguhate
Originally Posted by eklipz98' timestamp='1330665007' post='21468597
[quote name='rob-2' timestamp='1330656474' post='21468245']
I'm happy to see fuel rise.
...seems to me gas is under priced...
You sir, are the minority in your opinion here.
Yeah I would have to agree. I don't make an assload of money so to throw that much more at these oil companies doesn't please me one bit but all in all I have to do it. I do cut back on my spirited driving though to save money from my commute. I've even debated getting a subtle rear diffuser for one because I like the look but it also serves a purpose that might save a few cents a week.
[/quote]
Hating on oil companies is an silly game. Until their net profits exceed 10% they are operating within the 'zone' of normal business. The 90's where many struggled to be profitable forced them to reshape how they do business - you enjoyed stupidly low pump prices while men/women paid lots of money figured out ways to turn a profit - their job- and the general pump figured out ways to waste expensive gas - SUV/Truck craze.

The only person to blame for high energy prices is our stimulus and our society. Buy a few stocks in each oil company and enjoy in the wealth. No one is 'robbing you' or 'forcing' you to buy expensive fuel without the up side of it's profits - publicly traded companies allow for this distribution - while a socialist country wouldn't.

So this hating on the oil company for their profit is foolish.

If you did your research you'd also KNOW that fuel has never been cheaper in our nations history.

From another post I made -sorry if it seems I'm bashing on you - I'm not. I'm tired of the ignorance on this topic

Originally Posted by rob-2
Originally Posted by g0g3tt4' timestamp='1329944240' post='21440263
In my opinion "Free" was only used as a word of comparison against what we pay for energy right now. It's possible that you went too far in your thinking and then stepped up to the podium to expound your rant, but your point is taken.

Look up Stan Meyer. You tube the name. Find his invention.

Control energy, you control people, and eventually the world. "Free" energy has has been squashed at every turn by governments, and financial backers that couldn't see past greed. Call it what you will.
It may not be "free" in the purest sense of the word, but once you calculate what it costs to make make a gallon of fuel or where that one gallon of fuel can get you in comparison, "free" may be the appropriate word to use.
Lazy Man's summary of my post below-Energy has never been cheaper, we've never been wealthier, you should learn to give on less and beome less wasteful - big idea.

All the details

Interestingly though we've grown our economy on ultra cheap energy for the last 60 years. Who's been controlled?

Our foreign policy following WWII has been "The betterment of US people through peaceful means or otherwise". Thus we enjoy some of the cheapest energy costs in the world, lowest food prices, and the world is generally a safer place today than it was in WWII. We were so successful with our policies we doubled twice our GDP before 1960 and are the largest economy by miles. CHina only half ours but with 1 billion people.

I don't reject the basics of the we can create energy more efficiently debate but it strikes me as odd when the single largest way to improve our lives is to learn to live with less energy.

I challenge everyone who gets involved with such debates to look around their own lives. How many of you drive when you could walk? How many own heavy SUV or Trucks when a small car would do?

You know what I've found over the years? People want to debate or get excited over technology that means they don't have to reduce their use or become less wasteful. So it all becomes an intellectual debate, with little to no gains for people.

We have all the technology now to produce our own power and become energy independent. The little known sercet that no one seems to want to mention is at less than $200/barrel oil is the cheapest and safest form of fuel. We're consuming the worlds oil supply because it's in our domestic interests. Given enough time Canada and Alaska will be the largest reserves and close to home. Than we can kick into high gear all the alternative fuel programs we've invested in during the 70's.

But consider this. My energy bill is $70/month. My car, driven 400mils/month $100 in fuel. Yet a big screen TV shipped from Asia is about $500. A meal out at a nice place is $60+.

While we all jump up an down about $4/gallon gas, peak oil and the like it's all complete BS. We are living with ultra low energy prices.

Facts a gallon of gas in 1919 cost .25 which is $2.84 in 2005 dollars. But gasoline in 2005 was about $1.90. An amazingly 33% cheaper in almost 100 years.

Average house hold income $750/year in 1919 and in 2009 average income was $62K/person

FYI $750 in 1919 is only $9,826.52 in 2012 dollars. For the people in 1919 to live like we do today they would have had to see a 6.2 fold increase income.

Below you'll see the average person spends 50% more on healthcare or about as much on entertainment as fuel.





Conclusion - while tree huggers and off the gridders scream 'big oil is bad' they're all living, if in America, in the top 5% of the wealthiest people in the world. We could all use a little humility. Our views of the world are twisted. We don't need free energy, America needs to learn to live on less. Which btw our domestic use of gasoline is on the decline and that was per-recession. As for these create power from nothing, they aren't valuable until these inventors get scale behind them. Solar and wind on residential homes offers the best short and long term solutions to our energy needs while feeding extra back onto the grid.

Next person to debate shoudl come with more than opinion and be backed by facts and references. Alot of hot air opinion based debating has gone on long enough.


References
http://www.bls.gov/data/inflation_calculator.htm
http://www1.eere.energy.gov/vehicles...t_fotw364.html
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123957686061311925.html
Old 03-02-2012 | 07:34 AM
  #19  
Offtrack's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 746
Likes: 0
Default

Cheap gas can be had..........
Old 03-02-2012 | 07:49 AM
  #20  
gpwuster's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,160
Likes: 0
Default

oil company = bank "GREEDY"



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:45 AM.