California - Bay Area S2000 Owners California Bay Area S2000 Owners Group

The end of the line for the S2K?

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-23-2009 | 10:44 AM
  #21  
Voodoo_S2K's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 17,792
Likes: 3
From: Bay Area, California
Default

You guys are ballers. 15k isn't insignificant in my book.
Old 01-23-2009 | 12:50 PM
  #22  
UnkieTrunkie's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 109,174
Likes: 1,576
From: SJC
Default

Originally Posted by Voodoo_S2K' date='Jan 23 2009, 10:44 AM
You guys are ballers. 15k isn't insignificant in my book.


I'm lucky to get a Miata with an engine at this point. . . some serious Fred Flintstone auto-x right now. . .
Old 01-23-2009 | 02:02 PM
  #23  
J'sBlackAP1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,117
Likes: 0
Default

Yeah, I don't see 15K being insignificant ANYTIME in my life.
Old 01-23-2009 | 02:55 PM
  #24  
calis2kcr's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 420
Likes: 1
From: East Bay
Default

its true...i work for honda and the production for the new s2000 has begun. They are still trying to decide whether its going to be an s3000 3.0 TT or just the S which is a 3.5 v6 with 350 horsepower. unfortunately the car is much heavier and very similar to the size of the 350z. it will have the same 49/51 weight displacement and have a hard top convertable but the drag is definently going to be that its impossable for it to handle as nicely as our 2800 pound s2ks.
Old 01-23-2009 | 03:54 PM
  #25  
yamez's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,954
Likes: 0
From: fourzeroeight
Default

i agree with that.. all 3.0 TT!!! woot!!! woot!!
Old 01-23-2009 | 04:52 PM
  #26  
espelirS2K's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 17,670
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
Default

Originally Posted by calis2kcr' date='Jan 23 2009, 03:55 PM
its true...i work for honda and the production for the new s2000 has begun. They are still trying to decide whether its going to be an s3000 3.0 TT or just the S which is a 3.5 v6 with 350 horsepower. unfortunately the car is much heavier and very similar to the size of the 350z. it will have the same 49/51 weight displacement and have a hard top convertable but the drag is definently going to be that its impossable for it to handle as nicely as our 2800 pound s2ks.
not going to happen. They've already canceled the V10 NSX.. what makes you think they'll produce a 3.0TT motor, or a 3.5 v6? Speculation.. that's all it is. Show me your "sources"...

Maybe by 2012 they'll have a CONCEPT of something but I still doubt it..
Old 01-23-2009 | 05:25 PM
  #27  
ryanmatic's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area
Default

[quote name='espelirS2K' date='Jan 23 2009, 04:52 PM']
Old 01-27-2009 | 12:42 AM
  #28  
slightly2ned's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 8,527
Likes: 1
From: Yee!
Default

Honda officially released the news on their site, see original posting.
Old 01-27-2009 | 02:09 AM
  #29  
yamez's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,954
Likes: 0
From: fourzeroeight
Default

that is just sad.. end of days.
Old 01-27-2009 | 03:08 PM
  #30  
calis2kcr's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 420
Likes: 1
From: East Bay
Default

Originally Posted by espelirS2K' date='Jan 23 2009, 04:52 PM
not going to happen. They've already canceled the V10 NSX.. what makes you think they'll produce a 3.0TT motor, or a 3.5 v6? Speculation.. that's all it is. Show me your "sources"...

Maybe by 2012 they'll have a CONCEPT of something but I still doubt it..
well they are being smart about it they already have a concept and they hope to have it ready to release in 2012. just google it. its up there



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:39 PM.