10/21 AutoX Pics
10-29-2007, 04:28 PM
#14
Former Moderator
Originally Posted by Stephenopoly,Oct 28 2007, 11:38 AM
and thanks for blanking out the license 
10-29-2007, 05:20 PM
#15
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NorCal
Posts: 9,023
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by macr88,Oct 29 2007, 04:28 PM
You should tape it up because I'm sure the other 10 or so people taking pics aren't editing it.
... Jeff can i use the pic(18) as my new sig?
10-29-2007, 07:22 PM
#16
Originally Posted by macr88,Oct 29 2007, 04:26 PM
White cars in the sun look like poopoo.
10-29-2007, 09:48 PM
#17
Former Moderator
10-30-2007, 06:47 AM
#18
Former Moderator
Originally Posted by Orthonormal,Oct 29 2007, 08:22 PM
Not always. Credit: BryanH, who shoots almost as well as he drives.
10-30-2007, 08:43 AM
#20
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 3,491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
stephen: i never care if any of you guys use my pics as your sig...it flatters me
as far as the pic of john's car, i personally think it's underexposed a notch...and if you edit it to properly expose it, the front of the car will be blown out. the shot of mac's car taken w/ the markIII has the front blown out, just like my pic where you can't really see any details or lines of the hood.
so yah, mac, i agree w/ u...white cars in sunlight = poopoo
as far as the pic of john's car, i personally think it's underexposed a notch...and if you edit it to properly expose it, the front of the car will be blown out. the shot of mac's car taken w/ the markIII has the front blown out, just like my pic where you can't really see any details or lines of the hood.
so yah, mac, i agree w/ u...white cars in sunlight = poopoo