Skylines
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Melb
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My friend is thinking of getting one. Heard they're fast cars. Out of interest which can we beat (stock s2k) and which ones should we not bother even trying 2? Has the 34GTR been approved for australian roads?
#2
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,936
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I see a lot of (grey import) GTS-Ts on the roads. You can get one about 4 to 5 years old for maybe 25k. I don't know how quick they are standard, but almost none of them stays standard. Like all Nissan turbos they are "dial a horsepower" and can be very quick (and are RWD). All the GTR models seem to still be very expensive.
#3
Registered User
The R34 is very expensive.
When considering one of these you should be considering a brand new Porsche.
2nd hand R34's can sell as "cheap" as $145,000!!!
The engine's in these car's are good. Strong internals, and excellent for building a fast drag car with.
R33 GTR's are around the $45,000 - $50,000 mark. R32's are around the $30,000 mark.
here are some specs of standard cars:
R32 GTR: pwr: 206kw, 353 Nm
0-100km/h: 4.73sec
400m: 13.02sec
R33 GTR: pwr: 206kw, 368Nm
0-100km/h: 4.94sec
400m: 13.19sec
R34 GTR: pwr: 206kw, 392Nm
0-100km/h: 4.92sec
400m: 13.13sec
impressive huh... BUT, I liken driving these cars to driving a modded Holden Commodore. They feel as heavy and big. When inside the car you feel as though you're driving a sedan (with the exception of the R32)
I personally like the Toyota Supra twin turbo much better. Has a better interior. More sporty and such.
wil..
When considering one of these you should be considering a brand new Porsche.
2nd hand R34's can sell as "cheap" as $145,000!!!
The engine's in these car's are good. Strong internals, and excellent for building a fast drag car with.
R33 GTR's are around the $45,000 - $50,000 mark. R32's are around the $30,000 mark.
here are some specs of standard cars:
R32 GTR: pwr: 206kw, 353 Nm
0-100km/h: 4.73sec
400m: 13.02sec
R33 GTR: pwr: 206kw, 368Nm
0-100km/h: 4.94sec
400m: 13.19sec
R34 GTR: pwr: 206kw, 392Nm
0-100km/h: 4.92sec
400m: 13.13sec
impressive huh... BUT, I liken driving these cars to driving a modded Holden Commodore. They feel as heavy and big. When inside the car you feel as though you're driving a sedan (with the exception of the R32)
I personally like the Toyota Supra twin turbo much better. Has a better interior. More sporty and such.
wil..
#4
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,570
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
S2K2
I had an R32 in the early nineties. I was one of the 100 buyers of the small number which Nissan bought it . Believe me, it bears no resemblance in feel or handling to a sedan. I had some fairly heavy conversion work done on the vehicle and it was awesome.
Handling on the vehicle was exemplary. The R33 and particularly the R34 are better again. Even my grandmother could drive one of these quickly.
I wanted an R34 and would have probably settled on one eventually if I had not gone for a test drive in that damn S2000.... The S2000 is a bit of a toy compared to an R34 but boy, it's a lot of fun!
The R34 is not cheap but the problem is a lot of people don't quite realise how good it is. If I remember correctly, Wheels rated in the best two or three handling cars in the world in the last year. I don't think I will comment on whether it it similar to a Commodore. The Wheels rating should answer that.
I had an R32 in the early nineties. I was one of the 100 buyers of the small number which Nissan bought it . Believe me, it bears no resemblance in feel or handling to a sedan. I had some fairly heavy conversion work done on the vehicle and it was awesome.
Handling on the vehicle was exemplary. The R33 and particularly the R34 are better again. Even my grandmother could drive one of these quickly.
I wanted an R34 and would have probably settled on one eventually if I had not gone for a test drive in that damn S2000.... The S2000 is a bit of a toy compared to an R34 but boy, it's a lot of fun!
The R34 is not cheap but the problem is a lot of people don't quite realise how good it is. If I remember correctly, Wheels rated in the best two or three handling cars in the world in the last year. I don't think I will comment on whether it it similar to a Commodore. The Wheels rating should answer that.
#5
Registered User
The R32 and R34 are exceptions to the rule.
Personally though, I do think the R33 is very much like a sedan inside. Not as sporty/confronting as an S2000 or the R32, or R34.
I would seriously consider buying an R32 for fun . I saw one really, really nice one: Big, dished, nismo wheels, lowered nicely, and still very shiney.
The R33 is very much like a sedan inside though.. needs a pair of recaro's atleast to liven it up a little. Plus the airbag wheel looks like a stock standard non sports wheel. None of these niggles occur in the R32 or R34.
wil..
#6
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,570
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've never driven an R33 so I honestly can't comment. Somehow, that model just seemed to pass us by in Australia and then before you know it, there are a heap of grey imports around.
I have to admit I'm a little protective of the R32 simply because it set the standard when it was released. I'd never had a car before (nor have I had one since) that was so surefooted and competent on the road. About the only area where the R32 needed a little work was that the stock brakes could be stronger. With that addressed, the car was incredible - especially if you had the stage two or three conversion done on it.
It sure wasn't the prettiest car on the road though in black, it had a certain kind of brutal appeal. Mind you, in the early nineties, one got many open-mouthed looks in the R32 as everyone recognised it as the king of the mountain.
I have to admit I'm a little protective of the R32 simply because it set the standard when it was released. I'd never had a car before (nor have I had one since) that was so surefooted and competent on the road. About the only area where the R32 needed a little work was that the stock brakes could be stronger. With that addressed, the car was incredible - especially if you had the stage two or three conversion done on it.
It sure wasn't the prettiest car on the road though in black, it had a certain kind of brutal appeal. Mind you, in the early nineties, one got many open-mouthed looks in the R32 as everyone recognised it as the king of the mountain.
#7
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Melbourne!
Posts: 3,615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not sure I agree Wilch. A mate of mine has an R33 GTR-V, very sporty inside and out. What I don't like is the claustrophobic feeling you get because the glass area is so small.
It is a seriously quick car - he paid around $80k for his 18 months ago. I don't know if your $45-50K refers to the GTR-V or just the "standard" GTR.
So what happened to your much loved Godzilla, Bernie?
It is a seriously quick car - he paid around $80k for his 18 months ago. I don't know if your $45-50K refers to the GTR-V or just the "standard" GTR.
So what happened to your much loved Godzilla, Bernie?
Trending Topics
#9
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Melbourne!
Posts: 3,615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by bayarea408
too expensive for me
too expensive for me
Is it any wonder us Aussies get crapped off when we hear US owners whinging and complaining about high prices when what is to you a high price would be the bargain of the year to us.