CE28N 17x9.5 et35 or 17x10 et45?
08-09-2013, 06:39 AM
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CE28N 17x9.5 et35 or 17x10 et45?
Im planning to purchase a set of CE28 and i love the concave face on all four corners and i did a little bit of research on them but i have a little bit of questions for any of you that has any of these setups..im trying to run little to NO CAMBER (Yes im weaksauce LOL!!) this is my daily driver and I dont want to be going through tires every other month...
*given that I'm lowered 1.5" with fenders rolled flat and a slight pull on all four corners*
Which will fit better? 17x9.5 et35 or 17x10 et45??
Which tire size will fit better and not rub? 17x9.5 with 245/40 or 17x10 with 245/40 or 17x10 with 255/40??
Which pokes out more?
Im also leaning towards ASM front fenders and rear overfenders if this setup still rubs or that i have to run crazy camber...
If you have pictures of your setup, can you please post it up and state what camber and what you have done to your fenders and/or if you're rubbing?
Anything will help...thanks again s2ki
*given that I'm lowered 1.5" with fenders rolled flat and a slight pull on all four corners*
Which will fit better? 17x9.5 et35 or 17x10 et45??
Which tire size will fit better and not rub? 17x9.5 with 245/40 or 17x10 with 245/40 or 17x10 with 255/40??
Which pokes out more?
Im also leaning towards ASM front fenders and rear overfenders if this setup still rubs or that i have to run crazy camber...
If you have pictures of your setup, can you please post it up and state what camber and what you have done to your fenders and/or if you're rubbing?
Anything will help...thanks again s2ki
08-09-2013, 07:10 AM
#3
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
so 17x10 will be a better fit?? 255 will be functional and 245 will be semi stretched correct? im kinda going for that in between look...not hellaflush but yet functional and semi meaty...
Trending Topics
08-09-2013, 08:56 PM
#8
17x10 +44 Mackin spec (less concave - will clear BBKS, stoptech and Essex AP kit).
My second vote goes to 17x9.5 +47 (no concave either - will clear BBK also).
third place to 17x10 +45
and nothing for +35, won't fit on stock fenders even with a roll and pull.
My second vote goes to 17x9.5 +47 (no concave either - will clear BBK also).
third place to 17x10 +45
and nothing for +35, won't fit on stock fenders even with a roll and pull.
08-12-2013, 06:19 PM
#9
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Even with lots of camber, 17x10+45 requires raping your rear fenders (pull and roll). I can pretty much guarantee you will need to go overfenders if that's the route you take. That said, it should fit easily and well with the ASM f/r fender setup.
08-12-2013, 07:05 PM
#10
False^
Here is my first S2000 with 17x9.5 +35 CE's all around. I was -4 camber and 245/40 with no pull in the rear, just a cut (similar to rolling them)
http://www.flickr.com/photos/usdmej6/5802063446/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/usdmej6/5837537075/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/usdmej6/5841166990/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/usdmej6/8066112769/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/29754871@N05/5706076896/
Here is my first S2000 with 17x9.5 +35 CE's all around. I was -4 camber and 245/40 with no pull in the rear, just a cut (similar to rolling them)
http://www.flickr.com/photos/usdmej6/5802063446/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/usdmej6/5837537075/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/usdmej6/5841166990/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/usdmej6/8066112769/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/29754871@N05/5706076896/